Repurposing international organizations? Far-right funding in the field of migration governance

The rise of far-right governments has put international organizations under pressure. The recent financial cuts to the United Nations system by the United States have highlighted how member states can influence international organizations through funding decisions. Yet, far-right governments do not simply withdraw from international organizations or withhold all their money. Instead, we argue, they aim at repurposing international organizations to implement their international policy priorities. Based on data on earmarked funding to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration between 2004 and 2023, we show that far-right governments aim to align international organizations’ operational work with their anti-immigration policies: They shift funding between organizations, preferring International Organization for Migration over United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, relative to non-far-right governments, because of its broader focus on migration and return management. They also allocate funding to operational activities that better align with their preferences, thereby shifting United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees project activities outside its core mandate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957261483530
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repurposing international organizations? Far-right funding in the field of migration governance

Lisbeth Zimmermann, Alexandros Tokhi
Politics
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Repurposing international organizations? Far-right funding in the field of migration governance

Lisbeth Zimmermann, Alexandros Tokhi
article en

Abstract

The rise of far-right governments has put international organizations under pressure. The recent financial cuts to the United Nations system by the United States have highlighted how member states can influence international organizations through funding decisions. Yet, far-right governments do not simply withdraw from international organizations or withhold all their money. Instead, we argue, they aim at repurposing international organizations to implement their international policy priorities. Based on data on earmarked funding to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration between 2004 and 2023, we show that far-right governments aim to align international organizations’ operational work with their anti-immigration policies: They shift funding between organizations, preferring International Organization for Migration over United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, relative to non-far-right governments, because of its broader focus on migration and return management. They also allocate funding to operational activities that better align with their preferences, thereby shifting United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees project activities outside its core mandate.

Politics
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.