Advancing conflict research and response through satellite-derived data

Abstract With armed conflicts at a historic high and attacks on civilians rising 1 , understanding the evolving nature of conflict is a critical research priority. The current paradigm in conflict research relies heavily on text-based data, using fatalities as the primary—and often sole—proxy for violence intensity. Although these data have expanded our ability to study armed conflict, they exhibit inherent limitations due to uneven human reporting 2–6 . War damage assessments based on satellite data 7–13 offer a complementary perspective. Satellite-derived data have their own limitations, but these arise from different mechanisms, creating distinct, complementary strengths that can be leveraged through data integration. Here we propose three concrete approaches to integration: improvement, enrichment and fusion. Each bridges a different gap in the underlying data sources. We use case studies from Ukraine and Myanmar to illustrate how integration can be implemented in practice and the novel analytical insights that emerge. Prioritizing data integration enables a paradigm shift away from fatality-centric research towards a broader spectrum of violence, revealing the complexity of conflict dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11004-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Advancing conflict research and response through satellite-derived data

Emanuele Dalsasso, Devis Tuia, Konrad Schindler, Valerie Sticher et al.
1 citations
Nature
Transboundary Water Resource Management
15.81
article

Advancing conflict research and response through satellite-derived data

Emanuele Dalsasso, Devis Tuia, Konrad Schindler, Valerie Sticher, Corey Scher, Corinne Bara, Jenniina Kotajoki, Karsten Donnay, Jamon Van Den Hoek, Jan Dirk Wegner, Lars Bromley, Olivier Dietrich, Xi Li, Mikael Hiberg Naghizadeh, Filip Dorm, Thierry Crevoisier, Manuel Fiol
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract With armed conflicts at a historic high and attacks on civilians rising 1 , understanding the evolving nature of conflict is a critical research priority. The current paradigm in conflict research relies heavily on text-based data, using fatalities as the primary—and often sole—proxy for violence intensity. Although these data have expanded our ability to study armed conflict, they exhibit inherent limitations due to uneven human reporting 2–6 . War damage assessments based on satellite data 7–13 offer a complementary perspective. Satellite-derived data have their own limitations, but these arise from different mechanisms, creating distinct, complementary strengths that can be leveraged through data integration. Here we propose three concrete approaches to integration: improvement, enrichment and fusion. Each bridges a different gap in the underlying data sources. We use case studies from Ukraine and Myanmar to illustrate how integration can be implemented in practice and the novel analytical insights that emerge. Prioritizing data integration enables a paradigm shift away from fatality-centric research towards a broader spectrum of violence, revealing the complexity of conflict dynamics.

Nature
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), World Food Programme (IT), Oregon State University (US), German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE), University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Wuhan University (CN), Centre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing (CN), Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann (FR), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
15.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.