General practitioners’ perspectives on implementing a self-management mobile application for musculoskeletal pain

Background Musculoskeletal conditions are common, and digital self-management tools are increasingly used to support general practice. General practitioners’ perceptions of digital tools are key to implementation. Aim To interpret how general practitioners (GPs) perceive and implement a self-management exercise app for musculoskeletal pain in general practice. Design & setting Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with nine Danish GPs. Method Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, enabling an iterative and interpretive engagement. Themes were developed abductively informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, which was used as an analytical lens. The analysis explored how GPs perceived the clinical value and usability of the app, focusing on factors influencing implementation. Results GPs use of the app was influenced by the perceived compatibility with clinical workflow and clinical responsibility. Facilitators included trust in the app’s quality, user-friendliness, and peer endorsement. The app was perceived as useful in remote or financially limited settings. Barriers included increased workload, limited time and familiarity. Implementation was shaped by time pressures and intuitive judgements of patients’ digital literacy and adherence to exercise. The app was used as a supplementary tool, and implementation reflected pragmatic clinical reasoning rather than system-level objectives. Conclusion Successful implementation of mHealth tools depends not only on usability but also on GPs’ confidence in the quality and clinical value of the solution. A clearly defined purpose aligned with system-level objectives is essential for embedding mHealth tools as an alternative in routine care pathways rather than leaving their use to individual clinical purpose and judgement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BJGP Open
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpo.2026.0089
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General practitioners’ perspectives on implementing a self-management mobile application for musculoskeletal pain

Mette Terp Høybye, David Høyrup Christiansen, Cecilie Rud Butz, Eva Seerup et al.
BJGP Open
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

General practitioners’ perspectives on implementing a self-management mobile application for musculoskeletal pain

Mette Terp Høybye, David Høyrup Christiansen, Cecilie Rud Butz, Eva Seerup, Nina Sjørup Simonsen, Rasmus Østergaard Nielsen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Julie Sandel Jacobsen
article en

Abstract

Background Musculoskeletal conditions are common, and digital self-management tools are increasingly used to support general practice. General practitioners’ perceptions of digital tools are key to implementation. Aim To interpret how general practitioners (GPs) perceive and implement a self-management exercise app for musculoskeletal pain in general practice. Design & setting Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with nine Danish GPs. Method Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, enabling an iterative and interpretive engagement. Themes were developed abductively informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, which was used as an analytical lens. The analysis explored how GPs perceived the clinical value and usability of the app, focusing on factors influencing implementation. Results GPs use of the app was influenced by the perceived compatibility with clinical workflow and clinical responsibility. Facilitators included trust in the app’s quality, user-friendliness, and peer endorsement. The app was perceived as useful in remote or financially limited settings. Barriers included increased workload, limited time and familiarity. Implementation was shaped by time pressures and intuitive judgements of patients’ digital literacy and adherence to exercise. The app was used as a supplementary tool, and implementation reflected pragmatic clinical reasoning rather than system-level objectives. Conclusion Successful implementation of mHealth tools depends not only on usability but also on GPs’ confidence in the quality and clinical value of the solution. A clearly defined purpose aligned with system-level objectives is essential for embedding mHealth tools as an alternative in routine care pathways rather than leaving their use to individual clinical purpose and judgement.

BJGP Open
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.