Estimating the Congestion Benefits of Batteries When Network Connections Are Unobserved

I estimate the grid impacts of 126.3 MW of battery storage capacity operating in California during 2010 to 2017. I find that 1 MW of energy storage decreases evening peak prices by $1.11/MWh at the pricing node where the storage is installed while off-peak prices do not increase. The unobserved network structure is revealed and the price effects are estimated at other locations across the grid using a double-pooled LASSO-based estimator that reflects the grid’s constrained optimization price-determination process. Results imply a reduction in the cost of serving load of $123,700 per year per MW, an amount similar in magnitude to private revenue from arbitrage. Overall, I find early energy storage mandates in California are partially justified by reductions in the cost of serving load, and that effects are strongest at times in which increased penetration of zero-carbon solar generation impose higher costs on the grid. These patterns likely hold in any grid setting with inelastic peak supply relative to off-peak supply. JEL Classification: Q41, Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices; Q48, Energy: Government Policy; L14, Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks; H23, Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574261469461
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Congestion Benefits of Batteries When Network Connections Are Unobserved

A. Justin Kirkpatrick
The Energy Journal
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

Estimating the Congestion Benefits of Batteries When Network Connections Are Unobserved

A. Justin Kirkpatrick
article en

Abstract

I estimate the grid impacts of 126.3 MW of battery storage capacity operating in California during 2010 to 2017. I find that 1 MW of energy storage decreases evening peak prices by $1.11/MWh at the pricing node where the storage is installed while off-peak prices do not increase. The unobserved network structure is revealed and the price effects are estimated at other locations across the grid using a double-pooled LASSO-based estimator that reflects the grid’s constrained optimization price-determination process. Results imply a reduction in the cost of serving load of $123,700 per year per MW, an amount similar in magnitude to private revenue from arbitrage. Overall, I find early energy storage mandates in California are partially justified by reductions in the cost of serving load, and that effects are strongest at times in which increased penetration of zero-carbon solar generation impose higher costs on the grid. These patterns likely hold in any grid setting with inelastic peak supply relative to off-peak supply. JEL Classification: Q41, Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices; Q48, Energy: Government Policy; L14, Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks; H23, Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

The Energy Journal
Michigan State University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.