Causal Yield Mapping and Evaluation - A Graph-Based Methodology for Process-Driven Project Steering in BIM

Current BIM quality assurance operates in isolated silos: IFC models, schedules, and issues exist in separate systems without causal linkage. A missing property is flagged as a defect, but its impact on downstream processes — which milestone it blocks, which contractual deadline it jeopardises — remains invisible. This paper introduces Causal Yield Mapping and Evaluation, a methodology that unifies IFC building data, process landscapes (IoC Process Ontology), schedules, and BCF issues in a single traversable knowledge graph. The graph models the project as it is, not as it was planned: it continuously assimilates new data and derives forecasts from the current state rather than from an outdated baseline. A causal score quantifies the schedule relevance of each issue by traversing the graph from issue to task to edge to downstream milestones. Bottleneck identification follows Goldratt's Theory of Constraints: the bottleneck is the edge with the highest score on the critical path, and resolving it shifts the constraint to the next critical location. A weighted bottleneck ranking (Rank 1: current, Rank 2: predicted next, Rank 3: diminishing buffer) replaces flat issue lists. A two-layer separation keeps the scale tractable: atomic rule findings — tens of thousands per milestone check — carry the measured defect load, while curated issues are the tracked, communicated, and scored unit. Probabilistic forecasting is designed in three stages — Earned Schedule, Monte Carlo simulation from an actor–constraint matrix, and Bayesian networks — of increasing demand on historical project data. The methodology bridges the gap between BIM quality assurance and schedule-driven project steering, shifting BIM management from reactive issue processing to predictive, data-driven control. It is grounded in CPM, PERT, TOC, and Lean Construction (LPS), but extends them through weighted edges, heterogeneous graph traversal, continuous updating, and active cybernetic control loops. A reference implementation exists in the cyme™ platform of the author's firm. Concept paper (preprint, not peer-reviewed). First public version, September 2026. The methodology described may be cited and referred to freely under the CC BY 4.0 licence of this document; the platform designation is a trade mark of compendium BIM und Kybernetik GmbH + Co. KG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679582
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Causal Yield Mapping and Evaluation - A Graph-Based Methodology for Process-Driven Project Steering in BIM

Florian Kraft
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Construction Project Management and Performance
preprint

Causal Yield Mapping and Evaluation - A Graph-Based Methodology for Process-Driven Project Steering in BIM

Florian Kraft
preprint en

Abstract

Current BIM quality assurance operates in isolated silos: IFC models, schedules, and issues exist in separate systems without causal linkage. A missing property is flagged as a defect, but its impact on downstream processes — which milestone it blocks, which contractual deadline it jeopardises — remains invisible. This paper introduces Causal Yield Mapping and Evaluation, a methodology that unifies IFC building data, process landscapes (IoC Process Ontology), schedules, and BCF issues in a single traversable knowledge graph. The graph models the project as it is, not as it was planned: it continuously assimilates new data and derives forecasts from the current state rather than from an outdated baseline. A causal score quantifies the schedule relevance of each issue by traversing the graph from issue to task to edge to downstream milestones. Bottleneck identification follows Goldratt's Theory of Constraints: the bottleneck is the edge with the highest score on the critical path, and resolving it shifts the constraint to the next critical location. A weighted bottleneck ranking (Rank 1: current, Rank 2: predicted next, Rank 3: diminishing buffer) replaces flat issue lists. A two-layer separation keeps the scale tractable: atomic rule findings — tens of thousands per milestone check — carry the measured defect load, while curated issues are the tracked, communicated, and scored unit. Probabilistic forecasting is designed in three stages — Earned Schedule, Monte Carlo simulation from an actor–constraint matrix, and Bayesian networks — of increasing demand on historical project data. The methodology bridges the gap between BIM quality assurance and schedule-driven project steering, shifting BIM management from reactive issue processing to predictive, data-driven control. It is grounded in CPM, PERT, TOC, and Lean Construction (LPS), but extends them through weighted edges, heterogeneous graph traversal, continuous updating, and active cybernetic control loops. A reference implementation exists in the cyme™ platform of the author's firm. Concept paper (preprint, not peer-reviewed). First public version, September 2026. The methodology described may be cited and referred to freely under the CC BY 4.0 licence of this document; the platform designation is a trade mark of compendium BIM und Kybernetik GmbH + Co. KG.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.