Accuracy of the Interpolated Surface Mesh Method for OEP Volume Measurement

Background: Optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to assess both respiratory volumes and chest wall kinematics. An interpolation surface method (ISM) has been recently developed to enhance OEP kinematic analysis. The aim of this study was to test whether ISM is as accurate as the conventional method (CM) for volume measurement when compared with conventional spirometry. Methods: Pneumotachographs and OEP were recorded simultaneously on a healthy subject who performed quiet and deep breathing. Results: In total, 124 tidal volumes (TV) and 50 vital capacities (VC) were obtained. ISM introduced a lower bias for both TV and VC, with narrower limits of agreement for CM in both conditions. Mean discrepancies were systematically <2.15%. Correlation coefficients were in the interval [0.978; 0.991], with an ICC in the interval [0.968; 0.991] for both TV and VC. Conclusions: ISM and CM have similar volume measurement accuracies. ISM preserves the accuracy of OEP volume measurements and its software environment. Although ISM represents a promising approach for breathing motion analysis, its contribution to improving kinematic analysis remains to be evaluated across a broader range of morphologies and breathing patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185709
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Accuracy of the Interpolated Surface Mesh Method for OEP Volume Measurement

L Gaillard, Damien Riquet, Laurent Stubbe, Nicolas Houel
Sensors
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Accuracy of the Interpolated Surface Mesh Method for OEP Volume Measurement

L Gaillard, Damien Riquet, Laurent Stubbe, Nicolas Houel
article en

Abstract

Background: Optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to assess both respiratory volumes and chest wall kinematics. An interpolation surface method (ISM) has been recently developed to enhance OEP kinematic analysis. The aim of this study was to test whether ISM is as accurate as the conventional method (CM) for volume measurement when compared with conventional spirometry. Methods: Pneumotachographs and OEP were recorded simultaneously on a healthy subject who performed quiet and deep breathing. Results: In total, 124 tidal volumes (TV) and 50 vital capacities (VC) were obtained. ISM introduced a lower bias for both TV and VC, with narrower limits of agreement for CM in both conditions. Mean discrepancies were systematically <2.15%. Correlation coefficients were in the interval [0.978; 0.991], with an ICC in the interval [0.968; 0.991] for both TV and VC. Conclusions: ISM and CM have similar volume measurement accuracies. ISM preserves the accuracy of OEP volume measurements and its software environment. Although ISM represents a promising approach for breathing motion analysis, its contribution to improving kinematic analysis remains to be evaluated across a broader range of morphologies and breathing patterns.

SensorsVol. 26(18)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), ESIEA University (FR), Complexité, Innovation et Activités Motrices et Sportives (FR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of the Interpolated Surface Mesh Method for OEP Volume Measurement — L Gaillard, Damien Riquet, et al. · Sensors (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS