Unmasking ESG-washing: the power of transparency and gender diversity on firm value in the energy sector

Purpose Drawing from the legitimacy and signaling theories, this paper aims to investigate the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG)-Washing on the market value of energy companies, considering the role of the firm’s board gender diversity (BGD) and the disclosure of a corporate social responsibility report (CSRR) on this relation. Design/methodology/approach For this purpose, 173 companies from all over the world that operate in the energy sector were considered for the period between 2015 and 2024. The Generalized Method of Moments System (GMM-system) was used. Findings Results indicate that ESG-washing (ESGW) negatively affects firm value, whereas CSRR has a positive effect and helps to mitigate the negative impact of ESGW. In contrast, BGD has a negative effect on firm value and amplifies the negative impact of ESGW on market performance. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers/directors in ESG-sensitive industries, such as energy, should treat transparency and governance as substantive strategic tools rather than symbolic practices. Credible CSR reporting can mitigate market penalties associated with ESGW, whereas BGD, although inherently valuable, must be aligned with genuine ESG commitments to avoid adverse market reactions. These insights offer practical guidance for firms seeking to enhance resilience to ESG-related risks and safeguard firm value. Social implications This also highlights the broader social impact, as fostering gender diversity and increasing transparency not only improves corporate practices but also contributes to social equality and accountability, promoting a more sustainable and ethical business environment. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by jointly examining ESGW and its impact on firm value, while incorporating the roles of BGD and corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR) within a unified empirical framework, focusing on a highly ESG-sensitive industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Research Review
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-12-2025-1058
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Unmasking ESG-washing: the power of transparency and gender diversity on firm value in the energy sector

Mário Augusto, Catarina Proença, João Magueija
Management Research Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Unmasking ESG-washing: the power of transparency and gender diversity on firm value in the energy sector

Mário Augusto, Catarina Proença, João Magueija
article en

Abstract

Purpose Drawing from the legitimacy and signaling theories, this paper aims to investigate the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG)-Washing on the market value of energy companies, considering the role of the firm’s board gender diversity (BGD) and the disclosure of a corporate social responsibility report (CSRR) on this relation. Design/methodology/approach For this purpose, 173 companies from all over the world that operate in the energy sector were considered for the period between 2015 and 2024. The Generalized Method of Moments System (GMM-system) was used. Findings Results indicate that ESG-washing (ESGW) negatively affects firm value, whereas CSRR has a positive effect and helps to mitigate the negative impact of ESGW. In contrast, BGD has a negative effect on firm value and amplifies the negative impact of ESGW on market performance. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers/directors in ESG-sensitive industries, such as energy, should treat transparency and governance as substantive strategic tools rather than symbolic practices. Credible CSR reporting can mitigate market penalties associated with ESGW, whereas BGD, although inherently valuable, must be aligned with genuine ESG commitments to avoid adverse market reactions. These insights offer practical guidance for firms seeking to enhance resilience to ESG-related risks and safeguard firm value. Social implications This also highlights the broader social impact, as fostering gender diversity and increasing transparency not only improves corporate practices but also contributes to social equality and accountability, promoting a more sustainable and ethical business environment. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by jointly examining ESGW and its impact on firm value, while incorporating the roles of BGD and corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR) within a unified empirical framework, focusing on a highly ESG-sensitive industry.

Management Research Review
University of Coimbra (PT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.