Mitigating artificial intelligence-related animal welfare risks in animal farming

In animal farming, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly promoted as a means to enhance productivity, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve animal welfare. However, discussion of the animal welfare risks arising from these technologies, particularly emerging generative AI and computer vision tools, remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map technology-related welfare risks in animal farming. Firstly, by using 72 retained papers, we created a key word map, indicating that while precision livestock farming and animal welfare were commonly linked, AI tools were rarely discussed alongside ethical considerations. Secondly, using a subset of 52 papers that specifically discussed technology related welfare risks or mitigation strategies in detail, we examined how AI may drive or amplify each risk. Across the four broad risk categories identified, we selected five individual risks for which mitigation strategies are particularly lacking: (1) embedded value hierarchies ; (2) erosion of traditional farmer skills ; (3) shift of farmer identities; (4) objectification, instrumentalization, and speciesism ; and (5) humane washing . Thirdly, drawing in part on insights from other disciplines, we propose potential solutions to these five risks. We conclude that coordinated action among technology developers, farmers, and policymakers is necessary to ensure that responsibility for animal welfare is matched by the technical and economic capacity to act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2026.112408
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating artificial intelligence-related animal welfare risks in animal farming

Borbala Foris, Joshua Jarvis‐Campbell, Maximus Rafla, Marina A.G. von Keyserlingk et al.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Mitigating artificial intelligence-related animal welfare risks in animal farming

Borbala Foris, Joshua Jarvis‐Campbell, Maximus Rafla, Marina A.G. von Keyserlingk, Carmen Lopez, Alistair Bugg, Jack Zhu, Albert Didriksen
article en

Abstract

In animal farming, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly promoted as a means to enhance productivity, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve animal welfare. However, discussion of the animal welfare risks arising from these technologies, particularly emerging generative AI and computer vision tools, remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map technology-related welfare risks in animal farming. Firstly, by using 72 retained papers, we created a key word map, indicating that while precision livestock farming and animal welfare were commonly linked, AI tools were rarely discussed alongside ethical considerations. Secondly, using a subset of 52 papers that specifically discussed technology related welfare risks or mitigation strategies in detail, we examined how AI may drive or amplify each risk. Across the four broad risk categories identified, we selected five individual risks for which mitigation strategies are particularly lacking: (1) embedded value hierarchies ; (2) erosion of traditional farmer skills ; (3) shift of farmer identities; (4) objectification, instrumentalization, and speciesism ; and (5) humane washing . Thirdly, drawing in part on insights from other disciplines, we propose potential solutions to these five risks. We conclude that coordinated action among technology developers, farmers, and policymakers is necessary to ensure that responsibility for animal welfare is matched by the technical and economic capacity to act.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 256
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Central European University (AT), University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.