Nuclear Arms Control Needs a New Start

ABSTRACT The expiry of New START has left the world's two largest nuclear powers without legally binding limits on their strategic arsenals, highlighting the broader decline of nuclear arms control and disarmament diplomacy. At the same time, geopolitical tensions, declining trust among states, and the emergence of disruptive technologies in the domains of artificial intelligence, cyber, and outer space are creating new risks of nuclear escalation. This article argues that existing forums for nuclear dialogue are no longer functioning effectively and that traditional approaches to arms control are ill‐suited to today's multipolar security environment. In the absence of near‐term political momentum for formal negotiations, the article proposes a renewed focus on understanding and reducing multi‐domain nuclear escalation risks. It highlights the value of developing a new generation of arms control experts through Track 2 dialogue among nuclear‐armed states to build common understandings and support future official level talks. By fostering innovative approaches to risk reduction and strategic stability, these efforts could help create the conditions necessary for a new era of nuclear arms control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70234
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nuclear Arms Control Needs a New Start

Simon Cleobury
Global Policy
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

Nuclear Arms Control Needs a New Start

Simon Cleobury
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The expiry of New START has left the world's two largest nuclear powers without legally binding limits on their strategic arsenals, highlighting the broader decline of nuclear arms control and disarmament diplomacy. At the same time, geopolitical tensions, declining trust among states, and the emergence of disruptive technologies in the domains of artificial intelligence, cyber, and outer space are creating new risks of nuclear escalation. This article argues that existing forums for nuclear dialogue are no longer functioning effectively and that traditional approaches to arms control are ill‐suited to today's multipolar security environment. In the absence of near‐term political momentum for formal negotiations, the article proposes a renewed focus on understanding and reducing multi‐domain nuclear escalation risks. It highlights the value of developing a new generation of arms control experts through Track 2 dialogue among nuclear‐armed states to build common understandings and support future official level talks. By fostering innovative approaches to risk reduction and strategic stability, these efforts could help create the conditions necessary for a new era of nuclear arms control.

Global Policy
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.