Patient Experience and Preferences for Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION: Although type 2 inflammatory pathway dysfunction is a hallmark of atopic dermatitis (AD), disease symptoms in many patients are also driven by other immune/inflammatory pathway dysfunctions, all of which lead to varied treatment response profiles of targeted systemic therapies for individual patients. Adding complexity to the process of identifying which systemic therapy to prescribe for an individual patient is that these treatments have varied safety profiles, routes of administration, monitoring requirements, and costs-all of which are reviewed during today's shared decision-making discussions. METHODS: This patient assessment study aimed to better understand patients' attitudes toward contemporary AD treatments, their experiences, and their perceptions of a molecular test to predict treatment response. A 32-question assessment tool, deemed eligible for IRB exemption, was made available to any attendees with AD at the 2024 Eczema Expo who wished to complete it. RESULTS: Regarding treatment objectives, results indicated the top three factors most important to respondents (n = 40) were itch control (70%), skin clearance (58%), and safety/side effects (50%). For respondents switching from their initial topical therapy due to lack of efficacy (n = 37), 38% switched to a systemic drug. Among respondents who had used targeted systemics (n = 22), 18% switched systemics, 4.5% added another systemic, 32% added topicals, and 45% did not modify their initial systemic treatment. The top two reasons for switching systemics or adding a topical treatment to their systemic were insufficient skin clearance and itch control. Of respondents open to taking a new systemic therapy, 94% showed interest in a test that would inform them about which targeted systemic therapy would work best for them. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight a clinical need for personalized therapeutic guidance in AD to improve patient care and treatment satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatology and Therapy
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-026-01912-w
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Patient Experience and Preferences for Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis

Diego Ruiz Dasilva, Peter Lio, Lenka V. Hurton, Jeffrey Weinberg et al.
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Patient Experience and Preferences for Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis

Diego Ruiz Dasilva, Peter Lio, Lenka V. Hurton, Jeffrey Weinberg, Aaron S. Farberg, Tina Bhutani-Jacques, Adam Friedman, Joshua Burshtein, John Koo
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although type 2 inflammatory pathway dysfunction is a hallmark of atopic dermatitis (AD), disease symptoms in many patients are also driven by other immune/inflammatory pathway dysfunctions, all of which lead to varied treatment response profiles of targeted systemic therapies for individual patients. Adding complexity to the process of identifying which systemic therapy to prescribe for an individual patient is that these treatments have varied safety profiles, routes of administration, monitoring requirements, and costs-all of which are reviewed during today's shared decision-making discussions. METHODS: This patient assessment study aimed to better understand patients' attitudes toward contemporary AD treatments, their experiences, and their perceptions of a molecular test to predict treatment response. A 32-question assessment tool, deemed eligible for IRB exemption, was made available to any attendees with AD at the 2024 Eczema Expo who wished to complete it. RESULTS: Regarding treatment objectives, results indicated the top three factors most important to respondents (n = 40) were itch control (70%), skin clearance (58%), and safety/side effects (50%). For respondents switching from their initial topical therapy due to lack of efficacy (n = 37), 38% switched to a systemic drug. Among respondents who had used targeted systemics (n = 22), 18% switched systemics, 4.5% added another systemic, 32% added topicals, and 45% did not modify their initial systemic treatment. The top two reasons for switching systemics or adding a topical treatment to their systemic were insufficient skin clearance and itch control. Of respondents open to taking a new systemic therapy, 94% showed interest in a test that would inform them about which targeted systemic therapy would work best for them. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight a clinical need for personalized therapeutic guidance in AD to improve patient care and treatment satisfaction.

Dermatology and Therapy
Northwestern University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Friends United (US), Moscow University «Synergy» (RU), Forefront of Dermatology (US), Washington University Medical Center (US), Synergy Health (US), Infinity (United States) (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
Castle Biosciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.