Does AI Innovation Improve Corporate Investment Efficiency

This working paper examines whether artificial intelligence (AI) innovation improves corporate investment efficiency or may instead encourage excessive investment. It distinguishes between AI invention, adoption, corporate disclosure, and broader digitalization, recognizing that these activities capture different dimensions of corporate AI capability. The paper combines a targeted literature review with a proposed empirical blueprint for U.S.-listed nonfinancial firms. The intended baseline covers the period 2010–2024 and focuses on whether AI-related capabilities are associated with lower investment inefficiency, reduced underinvestment, or increased overinvestment. The proposed framework uses firm fundamentals to estimate expected investment and analyzes deviations from that benchmark, including CAPEX, R&D, acquisitions, and broader investment measures. Existing studies generally report favorable associations between AI-related measures and corporate investment efficiency. However, the evidence does not establish that AI patents cause better investment decisions across U.S. firms. The paper therefore emphasizes the distinction between association and causality, as well as the limitations of patent-based, disclosure-based, and policy-based measures of AI exposure. In addition to its academic contribution, the paper develops a practical capital-allocation framework for CFOs. It recommends selective investment, staged funding for uncertain applications, disciplined measurement of economic benefits, independent monitoring, and clearly defined expansion, pause, and termination criteria. No original firm-level panel has been assembled or estimated in this version. Accordingly, the paper reports no new regression coefficients, causal effects, confidence intervals, or project-level returns. All numerical illustrations are hypothetical. The contribution is a literature-based evidence synthesis, a reproducible empirical blueprint, and a managerial framework for evaluating AI-related corporate investment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22665140
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does AI Innovation Improve Corporate Investment Efficiency

N. Poggensee
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

Does AI Innovation Improve Corporate Investment Efficiency

N. Poggensee
article en

Abstract

This working paper examines whether artificial intelligence (AI) innovation improves corporate investment efficiency or may instead encourage excessive investment. It distinguishes between AI invention, adoption, corporate disclosure, and broader digitalization, recognizing that these activities capture different dimensions of corporate AI capability. The paper combines a targeted literature review with a proposed empirical blueprint for U.S.-listed nonfinancial firms. The intended baseline covers the period 2010–2024 and focuses on whether AI-related capabilities are associated with lower investment inefficiency, reduced underinvestment, or increased overinvestment. The proposed framework uses firm fundamentals to estimate expected investment and analyzes deviations from that benchmark, including CAPEX, R&D, acquisitions, and broader investment measures. Existing studies generally report favorable associations between AI-related measures and corporate investment efficiency. However, the evidence does not establish that AI patents cause better investment decisions across U.S. firms. The paper therefore emphasizes the distinction between association and causality, as well as the limitations of patent-based, disclosure-based, and policy-based measures of AI exposure. In addition to its academic contribution, the paper develops a practical capital-allocation framework for CFOs. It recommends selective investment, staged funding for uncertain applications, disciplined measurement of economic benefits, independent monitoring, and clearly defined expansion, pause, and termination criteria. No original firm-level panel has been assembled or estimated in this version. Accordingly, the paper reports no new regression coefficients, causal effects, confidence intervals, or project-level returns. All numerical illustrations are hypothetical. The contribution is a literature-based evidence synthesis, a reproducible empirical blueprint, and a managerial framework for evaluating AI-related corporate investment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.