Training Biomedical PhD Students in Applied Biostatistics with R: Lessons from a Three-Year Intensive Program

Statistical literacy is essential for biomedical researchers, yet doctoral training in applied biostatistics and reproducible data analysis remains limited despite the growing accessibility of open-source tools such as R. This retrospective observational programme evaluation examined three consecutive editions (2021–2023) of an intensive three-day doctoral course in applied biostatistics with R, delivered at the Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC) and the Universidad de Córdoba (UCO). Each edition enrolled 15 doctoral students with a 5:1 student-to-instructor ratio and used a problem-based curriculum of nine modules supported by a purpose-written open-access textbook. End-of-course examination performance was described using a ten-item multiple-choice examination; because the examination was not psychometrically equated across editions, score distributions are reported descriptively by cohort rather than used to infer cross-edition differences in learning or competence. Satisfaction was evaluated across four ACSA-aligned domains and was descriptively high in all editions; in the combined within-participant analysis, the Teaching Team domain was rated higher than the other domains. Self-reported theoretical and practical knowledge ratings increased descriptively from pre- to post-course within each edition. The 2021 ratings were reconstructed retrospectively from qualitative responses and were therefore not pooled or directly compared with the directly scaled 2022–2023 ratings. Qualitative feedback highlighted the theory–practice balance and low student-to-instructor ratio, with longer duration as the principal suggestion. The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of this intensive R-based training model, but the uncontrolled design, non-equated examination, small samples, and self-reported outcomes preclude claims about learning improvement, causal effectiveness, or durable competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16091467
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training Biomedical PhD Students in Applied Biostatistics with R: Lessons from a Three-Year Intensive Program

Lorenzo Rivas‐García, Pablo Pérez‐Martínez, Rafael Pineda, David García-Galiano et al.
Education Sciences
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

Training Biomedical PhD Students in Applied Biostatistics with R: Lessons from a Three-Year Intensive Program

Lorenzo Rivas‐García, Pablo Pérez‐Martínez, Rafael Pineda, David García-Galiano, Marina Mora-Ortiz, Inmaculada Varo-Urbano, Esther Porras-Pérez, David Luna-Gómez
article en

Abstract

Statistical literacy is essential for biomedical researchers, yet doctoral training in applied biostatistics and reproducible data analysis remains limited despite the growing accessibility of open-source tools such as R. This retrospective observational programme evaluation examined three consecutive editions (2021–2023) of an intensive three-day doctoral course in applied biostatistics with R, delivered at the Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC) and the Universidad de Córdoba (UCO). Each edition enrolled 15 doctoral students with a 5:1 student-to-instructor ratio and used a problem-based curriculum of nine modules supported by a purpose-written open-access textbook. End-of-course examination performance was described using a ten-item multiple-choice examination; because the examination was not psychometrically equated across editions, score distributions are reported descriptively by cohort rather than used to infer cross-edition differences in learning or competence. Satisfaction was evaluated across four ACSA-aligned domains and was descriptively high in all editions; in the combined within-participant analysis, the Teaching Team domain was rated higher than the other domains. Self-reported theoretical and practical knowledge ratings increased descriptively from pre- to post-course within each edition. The 2021 ratings were reconstructed retrospectively from qualitative responses and were therefore not pooled or directly compared with the directly scaled 2022–2023 ratings. Qualitative feedback highlighted the theory–practice balance and low student-to-instructor ratio, with longer duration as the principal suggestion. The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of this intensive R-based training model, but the uncontrolled design, non-equated examination, small samples, and self-reported outcomes preclude claims about learning improvement, causal effectiveness, or durable competence.

Education SciencesVol. 16(9)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), University of Córdoba (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.