A scoping review of the role of community programs in sustaining integrated HIV and health services

Community programs are essential for addressing persistent inequalities that perpetuate significant HIV-related disparities across various regions worldwide. However, the absence of a systematic framework for analyzing the role of community programs in HIV prevention and antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring impedes our ability to understand and study their effectiveness amid scarce health professional resources. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize available evidence on the role of community programs in driving sustainable integrated HIV and health services, examining their impact on various interventions along the HIV care continuum. Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and relevant gray literature sources for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2014 and December 2024. Search strategies incorporated Boolean operators and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to community programs and HIV services. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and resolved discrepancies through a consensus. The review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The initial search yielded 392 records. After removing duplicates ( n = 87) and screening titles and abstracts ( n = 305), 48 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. All included studies reported positive roles for community programs across various aspects of ART programs. Three studies (25%) highlighted the ability of community programs to mobilize resources, advocate for access to treatment, and monitor ART service delivery. Two studies (16.7%) demonstrated that community programs can expand HIV/AIDS interventions and ensure a seamless continuum of services from testing to care and treatment. Two additional studies (16.7%) emphasized the importance of community programs in empowering patients to manage their own care. Findings from this scoping review suggest that integrating community programs into HIV and health services represents a potentially effective strategy to address health workforce shortages and improve service accessibility. Decentralizing HIV services through community-based initiatives can increase access to essential health services, including ART. However, the evidence base of this scoping review remains limited by the small number of included studies, heterogeneous designs, and variable quality of evidence. More rigorous research is needed to assess effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability across diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02793-2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of the role of community programs in sustaining integrated HIV and health services

Deus Bazira, Ibrahim Bola Gobir, Piring’ar Mercy Niyang, Kolawole Olatunbosun et al.
Discover Public Health
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

A scoping review of the role of community programs in sustaining integrated HIV and health services

Deus Bazira, Ibrahim Bola Gobir, Piring’ar Mercy Niyang, Kolawole Olatunbosun, Pamela Gado, Itunu Dave-Agboola, Mabel Ikpeme, Vera Labesa, Dolapo Ogundehin, Joy Musa, Tersoo Usha, Chika Obiora-Okafor, Bashir Zubayr
article en

Abstract

Community programs are essential for addressing persistent inequalities that perpetuate significant HIV-related disparities across various regions worldwide. However, the absence of a systematic framework for analyzing the role of community programs in HIV prevention and antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring impedes our ability to understand and study their effectiveness amid scarce health professional resources. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize available evidence on the role of community programs in driving sustainable integrated HIV and health services, examining their impact on various interventions along the HIV care continuum. Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and relevant gray literature sources for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2014 and December 2024. Search strategies incorporated Boolean operators and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms related to community programs and HIV services. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and resolved discrepancies through a consensus. The review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The initial search yielded 392 records. After removing duplicates ( n = 87) and screening titles and abstracts ( n = 305), 48 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. All included studies reported positive roles for community programs across various aspects of ART programs. Three studies (25%) highlighted the ability of community programs to mobilize resources, advocate for access to treatment, and monitor ART service delivery. Two studies (16.7%) demonstrated that community programs can expand HIV/AIDS interventions and ensure a seamless continuum of services from testing to care and treatment. Two additional studies (16.7%) emphasized the importance of community programs in empowering patients to manage their own care. Findings from this scoping review suggest that integrating community programs into HIV and health services represents a potentially effective strategy to address health workforce shortages and improve service accessibility. Decentralizing HIV services through community-based initiatives can increase access to essential health services, including ART. However, the evidence base of this scoping review remains limited by the small number of included studies, heterogeneous designs, and variable quality of evidence. More rigorous research is needed to assess effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability across diverse settings.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Georgetown University (US), Federal Ministry of Health (NG), United States Agency for International Development (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.