Embodied Algorithmic Agency and the Observability of Intention: Why operational AI requires more than technical alignment

This interim HibriMind paper argues that embodied algorithmic agency requires more than technical alignment. Once artificial intelligence moves from model-bound output into infrastructure, sensors, robotic bodies, operational environments and institutional chains of authorization, the relevant object of governance is no longer the model alone. It becomes the complete decision chain through which perception is transformed into action. The paper proposes that embodied algorithmic systems require the observability of three upstream conditions: the intention that trains them, the institution that authorizes them, and the human who legitimizes their operational use. It grounds this thesis in an ontological distinction between human and algorithmic decision: human ethics emerges causally from the ontology of emotion, but emotion does not guarantee ethical competence; algorithmic systems lack an embodied emotional regulator and therefore require ethics to be explicitly encoded, audited and maintained as an operational condition of action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22659804
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Embodied Algorithmic Agency and the Observability of Intention: Why operational AI requires more than technical alignment

Joaquim Santos Albino
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Embodied Algorithmic Agency and the Observability of Intention: Why operational AI requires more than technical alignment

Joaquim Santos Albino
preprint en

Abstract

This interim HibriMind paper argues that embodied algorithmic agency requires more than technical alignment. Once artificial intelligence moves from model-bound output into infrastructure, sensors, robotic bodies, operational environments and institutional chains of authorization, the relevant object of governance is no longer the model alone. It becomes the complete decision chain through which perception is transformed into action. The paper proposes that embodied algorithmic systems require the observability of three upstream conditions: the intention that trains them, the institution that authorizes them, and the human who legitimizes their operational use. It grounds this thesis in an ontological distinction between human and algorithmic decision: human ethics emerges causally from the ontology of emotion, but emotion does not guarantee ethical competence; algorithmic systems lack an embodied emotional regulator and therefore require ethics to be explicitly encoded, audited and maintained as an operational condition of action.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pertamina (Indonesia) (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.