Recognizing emotional neglect in early childhood settings: A mixed-methods study

Childhood emotional neglect can have severe consequences for affected children, yet its detection remains challenging. Childhood educators are in a favorable position to identify it early, but empirical evidence on their ability to recognize observable behavioral indicators is limited. This mixed-methods study (qualitative descriptions and quantitative ratings) with N = 90 educators from German day care facilities and prospective educators assessed whether their reported indicators align with research-based mechanisms (e.g., reward processing, executive functions). Results revealed only partial correspondence: social functioning was frequently named (82 mentions, named by 71% of professionals), while critical indicators like executive functions (19 mentions, 8% of professionals) or emotion regulation (4 mentions, 2% of professionals) were rarely mentioned. Findings highlight the need for targeted training programs to enhance educators’ awareness of specific behavioral patterns associated with emotional neglect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Trauma Child Custody & Child Development
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26904586.2026.2730400
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Recognizing emotional neglect in early childhood settings: A mixed-methods study

Johanna Pretsch, Friederike Gerstenberg, Anke Gelhausen
Journal of Family Trauma Child Custody & Child Development
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Recognizing emotional neglect in early childhood settings: A mixed-methods study

Johanna Pretsch, Friederike Gerstenberg, Anke Gelhausen
article en

Abstract

Childhood emotional neglect can have severe consequences for affected children, yet its detection remains challenging. Childhood educators are in a favorable position to identify it early, but empirical evidence on their ability to recognize observable behavioral indicators is limited. This mixed-methods study (qualitative descriptions and quantitative ratings) with N = 90 educators from German day care facilities and prospective educators assessed whether their reported indicators align with research-based mechanisms (e.g., reward processing, executive functions). Results revealed only partial correspondence: social functioning was frequently named (82 mentions, named by 71% of professionals), while critical indicators like executive functions (19 mentions, 8% of professionals) or emotion regulation (4 mentions, 2% of professionals) were rarely mentioned. Findings highlight the need for targeted training programs to enhance educators’ awareness of specific behavioral patterns associated with emotional neglect.

Journal of Family Trauma Child Custody & Child Development
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.