Uncertainty quantification of the advanced detonation shock dynamics model

Reliable prediction of detonation behavior in condensed-phase explosives requires models that offer quantitative robustness while maintaining computational efficiency for practically sized (centimeter-scale) systems. Advanced Detonation Shock Dynamics (ADSD) builds on the classical Detonation Shock Dynamics (DSD) framework by incorporating shock acceleration. In this work, we introduce methodological advances to ADSD to improve its ability to describe shock-to-detonation transition (SDT), diameter effect, and detonation failure with reactive-burn level accuracy at a substantially reduced computational cost. We then perform a comprehensive uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis of the ADSD model parameters for PBX 9502 using experimental data from three experimental benchmarks: SDT, the diameter effect, and the shape effect. Statistical characterization is performed using UQ, yielding posterior parameter distributions that capture uncertainty and correlations; notably, many parameters showed low standard deviations, suggesting high confidence in their inferred values. The UQ-informed parameter sets are subsequently used to simulate corner-turning experiments, yielding predicted dead zones that show strong agreement with experimental observations. This combined optimization and Bayesian UQ framework provides the first systematic quantification of uncertainty in ADSD, enhancing confidence in its predictive capability and laying the groundwork for broader application of reduced-order detonation models in safety-critical engineering contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0344902
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty quantification of the advanced detonation shock dynamics model

Vaibhav Rajora, Beth A. Lindquist, Tariq D. Aslam, Ryan B. Jadrich et al.
Journal of Applied Physics
Combustion and Detonation Processes
article

Uncertainty quantification of the advanced detonation shock dynamics model

Vaibhav Rajora, Beth A. Lindquist, Tariq D. Aslam, Ryan B. Jadrich, Eduardo Lozano, Jeffery A. Leiding
article en

Abstract

Reliable prediction of detonation behavior in condensed-phase explosives requires models that offer quantitative robustness while maintaining computational efficiency for practically sized (centimeter-scale) systems. Advanced Detonation Shock Dynamics (ADSD) builds on the classical Detonation Shock Dynamics (DSD) framework by incorporating shock acceleration. In this work, we introduce methodological advances to ADSD to improve its ability to describe shock-to-detonation transition (SDT), diameter effect, and detonation failure with reactive-burn level accuracy at a substantially reduced computational cost. We then perform a comprehensive uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis of the ADSD model parameters for PBX 9502 using experimental data from three experimental benchmarks: SDT, the diameter effect, and the shape effect. Statistical characterization is performed using UQ, yielding posterior parameter distributions that capture uncertainty and correlations; notably, many parameters showed low standard deviations, suggesting high confidence in their inferred values. The UQ-informed parameter sets are subsequently used to simulate corner-turning experiments, yielding predicted dead zones that show strong agreement with experimental observations. This combined optimization and Bayesian UQ framework provides the first systematic quantification of uncertainty in ADSD, enhancing confidence in its predictive capability and laying the groundwork for broader application of reduced-order detonation models in safety-critical engineering contexts.

Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 140(10)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.