What Explains Support for Race-Related Topics in the Curriculum? Evidence From the Understanding America Study

Race-related content in the school curriculum is a subject of renewed political and policy attention. But what racial topics do Americans support students learning about, and what racial beliefs predict their views? This article reports on a large probability-based survey of American households on these topics. We find opposition to most racial topics in elementary schools and support in high schools as well as large partisan gaps on many specific topics. Certain attitudinal items—most notably valuing diverse contributions and concern about White students feeling guilty—are strongly predictive of partisan gaps. These findings provide much needed light for a debate that has animated substantial political controversy in recent years, suggesting paths forward for a more inclusive curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Researcher
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x261481780
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Explains Support for Race-Related Topics in the Curriculum? Evidence From the Understanding America Study

Daniel Silver, Amie Rapaport, Morgan S. Polikoff, Marshall Garland et al.
Educational Researcher
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

What Explains Support for Race-Related Topics in the Curriculum? Evidence From the Understanding America Study

Daniel Silver, Amie Rapaport, Morgan S. Polikoff, Marshall Garland, Anna R. Saavedra, Jacob F. S. Rowley
article en

Abstract

Race-related content in the school curriculum is a subject of renewed political and policy attention. But what racial topics do Americans support students learning about, and what racial beliefs predict their views? This article reports on a large probability-based survey of American households on these topics. We find opposition to most racial topics in elementary schools and support in high schools as well as large partisan gaps on many specific topics. Certain attitudinal items—most notably valuing diverse contributions and concern about White students feeling guilty—are strongly predictive of partisan gaps. These findings provide much needed light for a debate that has animated substantial political controversy in recent years, suggesting paths forward for a more inclusive curriculum.

Educational Researcher
University of Southern California (US)
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.