At least a fivefold gap in effective global marine protection

The Convention on Biological Diversity's ambitious target to "effectively conserve" 30% of the world's oceans in protected areas by 2030 risks being undermined by a primary focus on total area protected rather than realized conservation outcomes. Area-based assessments can overstate success because few marine protected areas (MPAs) possess strong restrictions and high compliance. Here, we estimate the extent that conservation outcomes are realized across the global MPA network for shallow reefs using standardized fish survey data. We first compare observed fish biomass from 552 surveyed MPA zones in temperate and tropical seas to modeled counterfactuals in the absence of protection, then extend these findings across the global network using key MPA attributes and predictive models. We estimate that at best, a quarter of the global MPA network is likely delivering meaningful conservation outcomes, with effectiveness strongly contingent upon the level of compliance with fishing restrictions. If shallow reef responses are representative of other marine ecosystems, then <2% of the ocean is effectively protected, compared to 9.8% presently reported. The unsupported assumption that MPA designation and management attributes directly translates to tangible biodiversity outcomes has apparently resulted in pervasive overestimation of conservation achievement. Critically, long-term success of MPAs will require further research, informed governance, and improved strategic policies that focus on the intricate mechanisms underlying compliance with mandated area restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2611733123
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At least a fivefold gap in effective global marine protection

Rick D. Stuart‐Smith, Ella Clausius, Mark J. Costello, José A. Sanabria‐Fernández et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

At least a fivefold gap in effective global marine protection

Rick D. Stuart‐Smith, Ella Clausius, Mark J. Costello, José A. Sanabria‐Fernández, Camille Mellin, Graham J. Edgar, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Genevieve A. C. Phillips, Eva Maire, David Mouillot, David Gill, Freddie J. Heather, Jasmin M. Schuster, Amanda E. Bates, Joshua E. Cinner, Joanna K. Schmid, Cyril Hautecoeur, Lisandro Benedetti‐Cecchi, Natali Lazzari, Christopher J. Brown
article en

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity's ambitious target to "effectively conserve" 30% of the world's oceans in protected areas by 2030 risks being undermined by a primary focus on total area protected rather than realized conservation outcomes. Area-based assessments can overstate success because few marine protected areas (MPAs) possess strong restrictions and high compliance. Here, we estimate the extent that conservation outcomes are realized across the global MPA network for shallow reefs using standardized fish survey data. We first compare observed fish biomass from 552 surveyed MPA zones in temperate and tropical seas to modeled counterfactuals in the absence of protection, then extend these findings across the global network using key MPA attributes and predictive models. We estimate that at best, a quarter of the global MPA network is likely delivering meaningful conservation outcomes, with effectiveness strongly contingent upon the level of compliance with fishing restrictions. If shallow reef responses are representative of other marine ecosystems, then <2% of the ocean is effectively protected, compared to 9.8% presently reported. The unsupported assumption that MPA designation and management attributes directly translates to tangible biodiversity outcomes has apparently resulted in pervasive overestimation of conservation achievement. Critically, long-term success of MPAs will require further research, informed governance, and improved strategic policies that focus on the intricate mechanisms underlying compliance with mandated area restrictions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(38)
University of Pisa (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Ifremer (FR), Duke University (US), University of Victoria (CA), Marine Conservation Institute (US), Nord University (NO), Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre (CA), CoNISMa (IT), Building Engineering and Science Talent (US), Ecologie & Evolution (FR), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), Boulder Environmental Sciences and Technology (United States) (US), Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (FR), Environmental Technologies (United States) (US), The University of Adelaide (AU), Lancaster University (GB), James Cook University (AU)
Pew Charitable Trusts, Australian Research Council, NextGenerationEU
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.