On the within-person effects of political attitudes on outgroup animosity: Evidence for Democratic-Republican asymmetry

On the basis of a within-person model of the relationship between political identity and outgroup dislike, Brandt and Vallabha (2025) suggested that changes in the strength of party identity, but not changes in the direction of this identity, are correlated with political animosity. These results are particularly interesting since they are consistent with the symmetric view of political ideology, which argues that partisans are similarly intolerant toward their political opponents. In this paper, we highlight conceptual and methodological issues that cast doubt on the validity of BV's conclusions. We also propose an alternative model and apply it to BV's data, alongside data from a second large dataset. Our findings indicate that Democratic and Republican respondents differ in the effect of identity strength on animosity, a result which is consistent with the asymmetric, rather than the symmetric, view. We conclude by discussing the methodological and conceptual insights gleaned from these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352103
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

On the within-person effects of political attitudes on outgroup animosity: Evidence for Democratic-Republican asymmetry

Yaacov Schul, Asya Pazy, Yoav Ganzach
PLoS ONE
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

On the within-person effects of political attitudes on outgroup animosity: Evidence for Democratic-Republican asymmetry

Yaacov Schul, Asya Pazy, Yoav Ganzach
article en

Abstract

On the basis of a within-person model of the relationship between political identity and outgroup dislike, Brandt and Vallabha (2025) suggested that changes in the strength of party identity, but not changes in the direction of this identity, are correlated with political animosity. These results are particularly interesting since they are consistent with the symmetric view of political ideology, which argues that partisans are similarly intolerant toward their political opponents. In this paper, we highlight conceptual and methodological issues that cast doubt on the validity of BV's conclusions. We also propose an alternative model and apply it to BV's data, alongside data from a second large dataset. Our findings indicate that Democratic and Republican respondents differ in the effect of identity strength on animosity, a result which is consistent with the asymmetric, rather than the symmetric, view. We conclude by discussing the methodological and conceptual insights gleaned from these findings.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.