Pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and pain intensity among patients with cancer in Oman and Lebanon: a comparative cross-sectional study

Despite advances in pharmacological management, cancer-related pain remains highly prevalent. Psychological processes such as pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance may shape pain perception, yet their independent and cross-national contributions remain underexamined. This study examined psychological, clinical, and contextual predictors of pain intensity among patients with cancer in Oman and Lebanon and explored the statistical mediating role of pain catastrophizing in the association between country and pain intensity. A comparative cross-sectional study of 200 adult oncology patients (100 per country). Participants completed the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and mediation analysis using PROCESS were performed. Lebanese participants reported significantly higher pain intensity and catastrophizing scores, whereas Omani participants reported higher pain acceptance. Pain intensity was positively correlated with catastrophizing ( r = 0.53, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with acceptance ( r = −0.35, p < 0.001). In multivariable regression, pain catastrophizing ( B = 0.05, p = 0.002), country ( B = 1.29, p = 0.04), and analgesic use ( B = 2.37, p < 0.001) independently predicted pain intensity (adjusted R 2 = 0.44). Pain acceptance did not remain independently significant. Exploratory mediation analysis indicated that pain catastrophizing statistically partially mediated the association between country and pain intensity (indirect effect B = 1.23, p < 0.001). Pain catastrophizing emerged as the most salient psychological predictor of cancer pain intensity and partially explained cross-national differences. Integrating culturally informed cognitive interventions with pharmacological treatment may improve pain outcomes in oncology settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11191-y
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and pain intensity among patients with cancer in Oman and Lebanon: a comparative cross-sectional study

Maha Jalal Dankar, Zeinab Al Azri, Jihad Hassan, Taif Al Senaidi et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and pain intensity among patients with cancer in Oman and Lebanon: a comparative cross-sectional study

Maha Jalal Dankar, Zeinab Al Azri, Jihad Hassan, Taif Al Senaidi, Badour Al Abri, Saida Al Maskari, Alyamama Al Maqbali
article en

Abstract

Despite advances in pharmacological management, cancer-related pain remains highly prevalent. Psychological processes such as pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance may shape pain perception, yet their independent and cross-national contributions remain underexamined. This study examined psychological, clinical, and contextual predictors of pain intensity among patients with cancer in Oman and Lebanon and explored the statistical mediating role of pain catastrophizing in the association between country and pain intensity. A comparative cross-sectional study of 200 adult oncology patients (100 per country). Participants completed the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and mediation analysis using PROCESS were performed. Lebanese participants reported significantly higher pain intensity and catastrophizing scores, whereas Omani participants reported higher pain acceptance. Pain intensity was positively correlated with catastrophizing ( r = 0.53, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with acceptance ( r = −0.35, p < 0.001). In multivariable regression, pain catastrophizing ( B = 0.05, p = 0.002), country ( B = 1.29, p = 0.04), and analgesic use ( B = 2.37, p < 0.001) independently predicted pain intensity (adjusted R 2 = 0.44). Pain acceptance did not remain independently significant. Exploratory mediation analysis indicated that pain catastrophizing statistically partially mediated the association between country and pain intensity (indirect effect B = 1.23, p < 0.001). Pain catastrophizing emerged as the most salient psychological predictor of cancer pain intensity and partially explained cross-national differences. Integrating culturally informed cognitive interventions with pharmacological treatment may improve pain outcomes in oncology settings.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
Beirut Arab University (LB), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Sultan Qaboos University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.