Self-Advocacy Activities and Voting Participation in Matched Samples of Americans with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Americans with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) vote at rates below those of the total U.S. population. Self-advocacy may hold a key toward increasing voting opportunity. We used data from two sources, merged at the individual level and aggregated over five years to construct statistically equivalent groups of adults with IDD who had and had not participated in self-advocacy activities to see how their voting opportunity differed. People with IDD who participated in self-advocacy activities were 12.7% more likely to have had the opportunity to vote than similar people who had not engaged in self-advocacy activities. This suggests that systemic investments to enhance self-advocacy may assist people with IDD to become a more visible and powerful voting block.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19349491.2026.2712223
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Self-Advocacy Activities and Voting Participation in Matched Samples of Americans with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Angela West, Sarah Lineberry, Michael Broda, Matthew Bogenschutz et al.
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Self-Advocacy Activities and Voting Participation in Matched Samples of Americans with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Angela West, Sarah Lineberry, Michael Broda, Matthew Bogenschutz, Seb Prohn, Parthenia Dinora
article en

Abstract

Americans with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) vote at rates below those of the total U.S. population. Self-advocacy may hold a key toward increasing voting opportunity. We used data from two sources, merged at the individual level and aggregated over five years to construct statistically equivalent groups of adults with IDD who had and had not participated in self-advocacy activities to see how their voting opportunity differed. People with IDD who participated in self-advocacy activities were 12.7% more likely to have had the opportunity to vote than similar people who had not engaged in self-advocacy activities. This suggests that systemic investments to enhance self-advocacy may assist people with IDD to become a more visible and powerful voting block.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-Advocacy Activities and Voting Participation in Matched Samples of Americans with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities — Angela West, Sarah Lineberry, et al. · Intellectual and developmental disabilities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS