From the lithium triangle to Ghana: State participation, industrial policy, and the governance of critical minerals in developing countries

As global demand for lithium increases, emerging economies with lithium deposits face a governance dilemma: should the development of these resources be left to private firms, or should the state intervene to capture a greater share of the benefits? In Ghana, this debate has intensified following the recent discovery of lithium. This study draws lessons from Bolivia, Chile and Argentina to inform Ghana's governance trajectory. These countries were selected because they represent contrasting models of state participation in lithium development: Bolivia has pursued a nationalist approach centred on state control, Chile a hybrid model combining state ownership with private-sector production, and Argentina a more liberal approach emphasising foreign investment. The governance choices examined here speak to a broader earth system governance challenge: how to ensure that the institutions underpinning the global energy transition distribute its benefits and burdens equitably, including for communities and countries on the extractive frontier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Governance
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2026.100359
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the lithium triangle to Ghana: State participation, industrial policy, and the governance of critical minerals in developing countries

Patrick Arhin, Gerald E. Arhin
Earth System Governance
Mining and Resource Management
article

From the lithium triangle to Ghana: State participation, industrial policy, and the governance of critical minerals in developing countries

Patrick Arhin, Gerald E. Arhin
article en

Abstract

As global demand for lithium increases, emerging economies with lithium deposits face a governance dilemma: should the development of these resources be left to private firms, or should the state intervene to capture a greater share of the benefits? In Ghana, this debate has intensified following the recent discovery of lithium. This study draws lessons from Bolivia, Chile and Argentina to inform Ghana's governance trajectory. These countries were selected because they represent contrasting models of state participation in lithium development: Bolivia has pursued a nationalist approach centred on state control, Chile a hybrid model combining state ownership with private-sector production, and Argentina a more liberal approach emphasising foreign investment. The governance choices examined here speak to a broader earth system governance challenge: how to ensure that the institutions underpinning the global energy transition distribute its benefits and burdens equitably, including for communities and countries on the extractive frontier.

Earth System GovernanceVol. 30
Department of Science and Technology (IN), University College London (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.