Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead

Portable handheld bioprinters represent a transformative advancement in personalized skin regeneration, bypassing the logistical constraints of stationary lab-based systems by enabling real-time, in situ fabrication of bioengineered constructs directly within the wound bed. This review aims to evaluate the current state of their development and clinical translation. One of the foci is placed on the stringent physicochemical requirements for bioinks, where we examined the critical balance between bioadhesion—facilitated by functional groups—and mechanical cohesion necessary for maintaining structural integrity during deposition, while RGD motifs are considered primarily as promoters of integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Preclinical studies have demonstrated promising effects of bioprinted constructs on wound healing and tissue organization; however, human evidence for handheld and direct in situ skin bioprinting remains limited, and clinical efficacy has yet to be established in controlled studies. Nevertheless, widespread adoption is hindered by inferior printing fidelity relative to stationary counterparts, a lack of standardized GMP-compliant bioink production, and regulatory ambiguity that impedes clear classification as either medical devices or biologics. Practical barriers, including intraoperative sterility assurance and operator training, also remain unresolved. Looking ahead, we discuss how the convergence of, in particular, artificial intelligence for real-time wound morphometry, closed-loop process control, and smart, self-healing biomaterials promises to surmount these obstacles. We conclude that these synergistic innovations may propel handheld bioprinters from experimental prototypes toward clinical tools with the potential to reshape reconstructive surgery and emergency wound care, although their clinical value will require validation in appropriately designed human studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14092021
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead

Anastasia Shpichka, Anna Solovieva, Raisa Chilova, Yana Khristidis et al.
Biomedicines
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead

Anastasia Shpichka, Anna Solovieva, Raisa Chilova, Yana Khristidis, Polina Bikmulina, Daria Revokatova, Boris Ershov, Peter Timashev, Andrey Kolosov
article en

Abstract

Portable handheld bioprinters represent a transformative advancement in personalized skin regeneration, bypassing the logistical constraints of stationary lab-based systems by enabling real-time, in situ fabrication of bioengineered constructs directly within the wound bed. This review aims to evaluate the current state of their development and clinical translation. One of the foci is placed on the stringent physicochemical requirements for bioinks, where we examined the critical balance between bioadhesion—facilitated by functional groups—and mechanical cohesion necessary for maintaining structural integrity during deposition, while RGD motifs are considered primarily as promoters of integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Preclinical studies have demonstrated promising effects of bioprinted constructs on wound healing and tissue organization; however, human evidence for handheld and direct in situ skin bioprinting remains limited, and clinical efficacy has yet to be established in controlled studies. Nevertheless, widespread adoption is hindered by inferior printing fidelity relative to stationary counterparts, a lack of standardized GMP-compliant bioink production, and regulatory ambiguity that impedes clear classification as either medical devices or biologics. Practical barriers, including intraoperative sterility assurance and operator training, also remain unresolved. Looking ahead, we discuss how the convergence of, in particular, artificial intelligence for real-time wound morphometry, closed-loop process control, and smart, self-healing biomaterials promises to surmount these obstacles. We conclude that these synergistic innovations may propel handheld bioprinters from experimental prototypes toward clinical tools with the potential to reshape reconstructive surgery and emergency wound care, although their clinical value will require validation in appropriately designed human studies.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(9)
Sechenov University (RU), Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.