Assessing agricultural resilience under varying economic classes in wet, dry, and normal climate conditions: an application of the novel framework

Climate change poses a major threat to agriculture in Senegal, which accounts for approximately 75% of employment and contributes 15.7% of national GDP. This study evaluates farmer resilience across economic classes under dry, normal, and wet climate conditions in the Groundnut Basin. The analysis applies a framework that explicitly represents the shock-failure-recovery sequence, thereby addressing a limitation of commonly used resilience assessment approaches. Income resilience is evaluated by examining the effects of planting date, plant density, and nitrogen fertilizer management under rainfed conditions. The framework integrates crop simulation outputs with economic risk modeling to quantify income decline following climate or management shocks and subsequent recovery across four economic classes. Resilience assessment combines simulated millet yield responses with socioeconomic and demographic information derived from surveys and the literature, enabling comparison of class-specific responses to climate variability and management choices. Results show that resilience varies across economic classes and management strategies. Late planting with moderate plant density improved resilience for most economic classes, whereas high-input practices increased vulnerability under extreme dry and wet conditions. Lower-income farmers exhibited higher resilience under certain climate scenarios but showed reduced resilience when adopting alternative management practices. These findings highlight the importance of context-specific adaptation strategies and bundled management interventions. The proposed framework supports resilience theory by linking biophysical variability with economic recovery dynamics and offers a practical tool to inform climate adaptation policies aimed at designing targeted, climate-smart strategies for smallholder systems in Senegal and other rainfed regions facing similar risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102137
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing agricultural resilience under varying economic classes in wet, dry, and normal climate conditions: an application of the novel framework

Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Amadiane Diallo, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Kieron Moller et al.
Sustainable Futures
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Assessing agricultural resilience under varying economic classes in wet, dry, and normal climate conditions: an application of the novel framework

Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Amadiane Diallo, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Kieron Moller, Mohammad Tirgari, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, P.V. Vara Prasad, Nilson Aparecido Vieira Junior
article en

Abstract

Climate change poses a major threat to agriculture in Senegal, which accounts for approximately 75% of employment and contributes 15.7% of national GDP. This study evaluates farmer resilience across economic classes under dry, normal, and wet climate conditions in the Groundnut Basin. The analysis applies a framework that explicitly represents the shock-failure-recovery sequence, thereby addressing a limitation of commonly used resilience assessment approaches. Income resilience is evaluated by examining the effects of planting date, plant density, and nitrogen fertilizer management under rainfed conditions. The framework integrates crop simulation outputs with economic risk modeling to quantify income decline following climate or management shocks and subsequent recovery across four economic classes. Resilience assessment combines simulated millet yield responses with socioeconomic and demographic information derived from surveys and the literature, enabling comparison of class-specific responses to climate variability and management choices. Results show that resilience varies across economic classes and management strategies. Late planting with moderate plant density improved resilience for most economic classes, whereas high-input practices increased vulnerability under extreme dry and wet conditions. Lower-income farmers exhibited higher resilience under certain climate scenarios but showed reduced resilience when adopting alternative management practices. These findings highlight the importance of context-specific adaptation strategies and bundled management interventions. The proposed framework supports resilience theory by linking biophysical variability with economic recovery dynamics and offers a practical tool to inform climate adaptation policies aimed at designing targeted, climate-smart strategies for smallholder systems in Senegal and other rainfed regions facing similar risks.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 12
Kansas State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Ministère de l'Agriculture (CI), Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Èquipement Rural (SN), North Dakota State University (US), Michigan State University (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
United States Agency for International Development, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.