Addressing a posteriori performance degradation in neural network subgrid stress models

Neural network subgrid stress models often have a priori performance that is far better than the a posteriori performance, leading to neural network models that look very promising a priori completely failing in a posteriori large eddy simulations (LESs). This performance gap can be decreased by combining two different methods, training data augmentation and reducing input complexity to the neural network. Augmenting the training data with two different filter shapes before training the neural networks has no performance degradation a priori as compared with a neural network trained with one filter. A posteriori , neural networks trained with two different filters are more robust across two LES codes with different high-order numerical schemes. In addition, by ablating away the higher-order terms input into the neural network, the a priori versus a posteriori performance changes become less apparent. When combined, neural networks that use both training data augmentation and a less complex set of inputs have a posteriori performance more reflective of their a priori evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.11995
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Addressing a posteriori performance degradation in neural network subgrid stress models

Andy Wu, Sanjiva Lele
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Addressing a posteriori performance degradation in neural network subgrid stress models

Andy Wu, Sanjiva Lele
article en

Abstract

Neural network subgrid stress models often have a priori performance that is far better than the a posteriori performance, leading to neural network models that look very promising a priori completely failing in a posteriori large eddy simulations (LESs). This performance gap can be decreased by combining two different methods, training data augmentation and reducing input complexity to the neural network. Augmenting the training data with two different filter shapes before training the neural networks has no performance degradation a priori as compared with a neural network trained with one filter. A posteriori , neural networks trained with two different filters are more robust across two LES codes with different high-order numerical schemes. In addition, by ablating away the higher-order terms input into the neural network, the a priori versus a posteriori performance changes become less apparent. When combined, neural networks that use both training data augmentation and a less complex set of inputs have a posteriori performance more reflective of their a priori evaluation.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1042
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.