Predictive Value of the HATCH Score for New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following TAVI

ABSTRACT Background New‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is associated with adverse outcomes, yet simple pre‐procedural tools to identify at‐risk patients are limited. The HATCH score predicts incident atrial fibrillation in other settings but has not been evaluated in TAVI. We assessed whether the HATCH score predicts NOAF after transfemoral TAVI and compared it with the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score. Methods In this retrospective single‐center study, 268 patients in sinus rhythm who underwent transfemoral TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between October 2022 and January 2026 were included. NOAF was defined as atrial fibrillation or flutter lasting ≥ 30 s during the index hospitalization. Independent predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression; discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), compared using the DeLong test, and internally validated by bootstrapping. Results NOAF occurred in 44 patients (16.4%). The HATCH score was higher in the NOAF group (2.75 ± 0.81 vs. 2.03 ± 0.85; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the HATCH score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.75–4.13; p < 0.001) and aortic root angulation (adjusted OR 1.05 per degree, 95% CI 1.02–1.09; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of NOAF. The HATCH score yielded an AUC of 0.730 (95% CI 0.672–0.782), numerically higher than that of the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score (0.668, 95% CI 0.608–0.724), although the difference was not significant ( p = 0.216); a HATCH score ≥ 3 provided 63.6% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. The optimism‐corrected C‐statistic was 0.761 with a calibration slope of 0.918. NOAF was associated with a higher rate of in‐hospital stroke (15.9% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.005). Conclusions The HATCH score independently predicted NOAF after transfemoral TAVI and performed at least as well as the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score; aortic root angulation was an additional independent correlate. As a simple, bedside tool, the HATCH score may aid pre‐procedural risk stratification, pending external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70845
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Predictive Value of the HATCH Score for New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following TAVI

Mehmet Taha Özkan, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Bülent Özlek, O. Ozcan et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Predictive Value of the HATCH Score for New‐Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following TAVI

Mehmet Taha Özkan, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Bülent Özlek, O. Ozcan, Çağatay Tunca, Fatih Cihat Büyükbaş, Reha Yasin Şengül, Ahsen Özge Akpınar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background New‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is associated with adverse outcomes, yet simple pre‐procedural tools to identify at‐risk patients are limited. The HATCH score predicts incident atrial fibrillation in other settings but has not been evaluated in TAVI. We assessed whether the HATCH score predicts NOAF after transfemoral TAVI and compared it with the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score. Methods In this retrospective single‐center study, 268 patients in sinus rhythm who underwent transfemoral TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between October 2022 and January 2026 were included. NOAF was defined as atrial fibrillation or flutter lasting ≥ 30 s during the index hospitalization. Independent predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression; discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), compared using the DeLong test, and internally validated by bootstrapping. Results NOAF occurred in 44 patients (16.4%). The HATCH score was higher in the NOAF group (2.75 ± 0.81 vs. 2.03 ± 0.85; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the HATCH score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.75–4.13; p < 0.001) and aortic root angulation (adjusted OR 1.05 per degree, 95% CI 1.02–1.09; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of NOAF. The HATCH score yielded an AUC of 0.730 (95% CI 0.672–0.782), numerically higher than that of the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score (0.668, 95% CI 0.608–0.724), although the difference was not significant ( p = 0.216); a HATCH score ≥ 3 provided 63.6% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. The optimism‐corrected C‐statistic was 0.761 with a calibration slope of 0.918. NOAF was associated with a higher rate of in‐hospital stroke (15.9% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.005). Conclusions The HATCH score independently predicted NOAF after transfemoral TAVI and performed at least as well as the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score; aortic root angulation was an additional independent correlate. As a simple, bedside tool, the HATCH score may aid pre‐procedural risk stratification, pending external validation.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.