Scleral buckling versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 20-year retrospective comparative study

Scleral buckling (SB) has been progressively displaced by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD); however, this transition appears to be driven more by evolving surgical training patterns than by clear differences in outcome data. Long-term comparative evidence spanning the full arc of this shift remains scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 373 eyes (367 patients) undergoing SB ( n = 172) or PPV/SB ( n = 201) for primary RRD over a 20-year period (2002–2022) at a tertiary referral center. Primary anatomical success was defined as retinal attachment maintained without additional retinal surgery during the first three postoperative months, whereas final anatomical success was defined as retinal attachment at the last follow-up. Functional success required ≥ 2-line improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Binary logistic regression identified independent predictors of anatomical and functional success. SB utilization fell from two-thirds to one-third of procedures over the study period, including among phakic patients. Final anatomical success was comparable between groups (98.3% vs. 98.0%; p = 1.00). SB preserved the crystalline lens substantially longer, with a threefold greater interval to cataract extraction (14.9 vs. 4.2 months) and a markedly lower extraction rate (24.4% vs. 68.8%). Final functional success was higher in the PPV/SB group (72.6% vs. 61.0%; p = 0.011), and multivariable analysis similarly identified worse preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as independently associated with higher odds of both primary and final functional success. Both findings likely reflect the greater potential for measurable improvement in eyes with poorer baseline vision rather than a true surgical advantage. Preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade C–D was independently associated with lower odds of primary anatomical success, whereas pseudophakia was independently associated only with final functional success. SB achieved durable anatomical reattachment with a clinically meaningful advantage in crystalline lens preservation. Although its use has declined over time, SB remains an important surgical option in appropriately selected RRD cases, highlighting the value of maintaining proficiency with this technique in contemporary vitreoretinal practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-05314-6
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Scleral buckling versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 20-year retrospective comparative study

Ceyda Erişti Bölük, Ahmet Burak Acar, Lütfi Raşid Alkan, Ihsan Gokhan Gurelik et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Scleral buckling versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 20-year retrospective comparative study

Ceyda Erişti Bölük, Ahmet Burak Acar, Lütfi Raşid Alkan, Ihsan Gokhan Gurelik, Burcu Atay, Ebru Yalcin, Sengul Ozdek
article en

Abstract

Scleral buckling (SB) has been progressively displaced by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD); however, this transition appears to be driven more by evolving surgical training patterns than by clear differences in outcome data. Long-term comparative evidence spanning the full arc of this shift remains scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 373 eyes (367 patients) undergoing SB ( n = 172) or PPV/SB ( n = 201) for primary RRD over a 20-year period (2002–2022) at a tertiary referral center. Primary anatomical success was defined as retinal attachment maintained without additional retinal surgery during the first three postoperative months, whereas final anatomical success was defined as retinal attachment at the last follow-up. Functional success required ≥ 2-line improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Binary logistic regression identified independent predictors of anatomical and functional success. SB utilization fell from two-thirds to one-third of procedures over the study period, including among phakic patients. Final anatomical success was comparable between groups (98.3% vs. 98.0%; p = 1.00). SB preserved the crystalline lens substantially longer, with a threefold greater interval to cataract extraction (14.9 vs. 4.2 months) and a markedly lower extraction rate (24.4% vs. 68.8%). Final functional success was higher in the PPV/SB group (72.6% vs. 61.0%; p = 0.011), and multivariable analysis similarly identified worse preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as independently associated with higher odds of both primary and final functional success. Both findings likely reflect the greater potential for measurable improvement in eyes with poorer baseline vision rather than a true surgical advantage. Preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade C–D was independently associated with lower odds of primary anatomical success, whereas pseudophakia was independently associated only with final functional success. SB achieved durable anatomical reattachment with a clinically meaningful advantage in crystalline lens preservation. Although its use has declined over time, SB remains an important surgical option in appropriately selected RRD cases, highlighting the value of maintaining proficiency with this technique in contemporary vitreoretinal practice.

BMC Ophthalmology
Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.