Predicting patient care pathway deviations and their consequences in anaesthesia using machine learning

Deviation from the intended perioperative care pathway, particularly unplanned admission after day-case surgery, affects patient safety and the efficient organisation of care. We aimed to develop and compare interpretable machine-learning models predicting such deviations from information available before surgery. In this retrospective study, 51,112 consecutive ambulatory anaesthesia procedures from a Belgian network were analysed, with unplanned admission as the outcome. Data were partitioned into training, validation, and test sets; class imbalance was addressed with SMOTENC on the training data alone. Seven algorithms: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, histogram-based gradient boosting, and explainable boosting machine (EBM) were compared using discrimination, precision-recall, and calibration metrics at two operating points (fixed sensitivity and fixed specificity). Unplanned admission occurred in 9.08% of patients. Discrimination varied markedly, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve achieved by the explainable boosting machine (EBM, 0.826), the lowest by logistic regression (0.595). Given the rarity of the outcome, precision-recall was most informative: the EBM attained both the highest average precision (0.472) and F1-score (0.392), exceeding the black-box ensembles while remaining intrinsically interpretable. Performance was stable between validation and test sets, arguing against overfitting, although all models over-estimated risk and need recalibration. Machine learning applied to routinely collected data can identify patients at risk of deviating from their intended day-case pathway with stable performance and the potential for clinical usefulness. The explainable boosting machine is especially attractive, combining competitive accuracy with transparency. Prospective validation and recalibration of the predicted probabilities will be required before clinical deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01496-y
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Predicting patient care pathway deviations and their consequences in anaesthesia using machine learning

Rémi Florquin, Philippe Dony
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Predicting patient care pathway deviations and their consequences in anaesthesia using machine learning

Rémi Florquin, Philippe Dony
article en

Abstract

Deviation from the intended perioperative care pathway, particularly unplanned admission after day-case surgery, affects patient safety and the efficient organisation of care. We aimed to develop and compare interpretable machine-learning models predicting such deviations from information available before surgery. In this retrospective study, 51,112 consecutive ambulatory anaesthesia procedures from a Belgian network were analysed, with unplanned admission as the outcome. Data were partitioned into training, validation, and test sets; class imbalance was addressed with SMOTENC on the training data alone. Seven algorithms: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, histogram-based gradient boosting, and explainable boosting machine (EBM) were compared using discrimination, precision-recall, and calibration metrics at two operating points (fixed sensitivity and fixed specificity). Unplanned admission occurred in 9.08% of patients. Discrimination varied markedly, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve achieved by the explainable boosting machine (EBM, 0.826), the lowest by logistic regression (0.595). Given the rarity of the outcome, precision-recall was most informative: the EBM attained both the highest average precision (0.472) and F1-score (0.392), exceeding the black-box ensembles while remaining intrinsically interpretable. Performance was stable between validation and test sets, arguing against overfitting, although all models over-estimated risk and need recalibration. Machine learning applied to routinely collected data can identify patients at risk of deviating from their intended day-case pathway with stable performance and the potential for clinical usefulness. The explainable boosting machine is especially attractive, combining competitive accuracy with transparency. Prospective validation and recalibration of the predicted probabilities will be required before clinical deployment.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
University of Mons (BE), Statistics Belgium (BE), Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.