Smart Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: From Microenvironmental Modulation to Personalized Therapy

The rapid evolution of smart biomaterials has opened new therapeutic avenues for complex bone defects, non-union fractures, and post-tumor resection reconstruction. Conventional bone substitutes often suffer from insufficient bioactivity, mechanical mismatch, and a lack of capacity to modulate the healing microenvironment. In contrast, smart biomaterials can dynamically adjust their physicochemical properties in response to external stimuli (light, electricity, magnetic fields, or mechanical forces) or internal cues (ROS, pH, or enzyme activity), enabling precise control over cellular behaviors and local microenvironmental dynamics. Recent advances in immuno-engineered materials, particularly those designed to polarize macrophages toward a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, have shown promise in attenuating inflammation and accelerating osteogenesis. Concurrently, 3D/4D printing technologies enable programmable control of scaffold architecture, degradation profiles, and the spatial distribution of bioactive factors, thereby supporting personalized therapeutic strategies. Artificial-intelligence-driven material discovery and structural optimization further expand the design space for next-generation, high-performance bone repair biomaterials. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent progress in smart biomaterials for bone regeneration, with emphasis on stimulus-responsive mechanisms, immune-modulatory strategies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and AI-enabled design, and highlights the key barriers and future directions for their clinical translation. In this review, smart biomaterial is used as an umbrella term; stimulus-responsive biomaterial denotes the subclass that responds to an external trigger (light, magnetic, electrical, mechanical, pH, ROS, or enzyme); and intelligent biomaterial is treated as synonymous with smart biomaterial. These terms are not used interchangeably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3791/71939
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Smart Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: From Microenvironmental Modulation to Personalized Therapy

Jindi Han, Haoxuan Li, Jinyang Du, Baojian Zhang et al.
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Smart Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: From Microenvironmental Modulation to Personalized Therapy

Jindi Han, Haoxuan Li, Jinyang Du, Baojian Zhang, Yanqun Liu
article en

Abstract

The rapid evolution of smart biomaterials has opened new therapeutic avenues for complex bone defects, non-union fractures, and post-tumor resection reconstruction. Conventional bone substitutes often suffer from insufficient bioactivity, mechanical mismatch, and a lack of capacity to modulate the healing microenvironment. In contrast, smart biomaterials can dynamically adjust their physicochemical properties in response to external stimuli (light, electricity, magnetic fields, or mechanical forces) or internal cues (ROS, pH, or enzyme activity), enabling precise control over cellular behaviors and local microenvironmental dynamics. Recent advances in immuno-engineered materials, particularly those designed to polarize macrophages toward a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, have shown promise in attenuating inflammation and accelerating osteogenesis. Concurrently, 3D/4D printing technologies enable programmable control of scaffold architecture, degradation profiles, and the spatial distribution of bioactive factors, thereby supporting personalized therapeutic strategies. Artificial-intelligence-driven material discovery and structural optimization further expand the design space for next-generation, high-performance bone repair biomaterials. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent progress in smart biomaterials for bone regeneration, with emphasis on stimulus-responsive mechanisms, immune-modulatory strategies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and AI-enabled design, and highlights the key barriers and future directions for their clinical translation. In this review, smart biomaterial is used as an umbrella term; stimulus-responsive biomaterial denotes the subclass that responds to an external trigger (light, magnetic, electrical, mechanical, pH, ROS, or enzyme); and intelligent biomaterial is treated as synonymous with smart biomaterial. These terms are not used interchangeably.

Journal of Visualized Experiments(235)
Yanbian University Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smart Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: From Microenvironmental Modulation to Personalized Therapy — Jindi Han, Haoxuan Li, et al. · Journal of Visualized Experiments (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS