Preliminary evaluation of a large language model for pediatric uroflowmetry interpretation: a single-center comparative analysis with local expert consensus

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence system in interpreting pediatric uroflowmetry (UFM) results using both conceptual knowledge and real-world clinical data. This retrospectively designed study involved a two-stage evaluation. In the first stage, 15 conceptual questions related to UFM were presented to the model. In the second stage, anonymized UFM recordings from 225 children aged 5–18 years were evaluated in five sequential analysis steps. Responses were reviewed by a pediatric urologist and a pediatric nephrologist on a 0–2 point scale for accuracy, clinical reliability, and comprehensibility. All responses to conceptual questions were clinically accurate; however, only 64.4% of cited sources were considered reliable, with a substantial proportion identified as hallucinated citations. A total of 1125 responses from real clinical cases were analyzed. The cohort comprised a heterogeneous case mix including normal ( n = 96, 42.7%), abnormal ( n = 93, 41.3%), and suboptimal quality ( n = 36, 16.0%) recordings. Model responses demonstrated complete agreement with local, non-blinded expert consensus across all cases and all subgroups, with clinical accuracy, reliability, and comprehensibility rates of 100%. Visual reading differences due to handwritten PVR values were observed in six cases but did not affect the diagnostic approach or recommended management. The model’s mean self-reported confidence level was 88.4%. In this single-center, preliminary evaluation, the large language model’s responses showed complete raw agreement with local expert opinion in pediatric UFM interpretation; these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. The findings support the potential use of artificial intelligence as a clinical decision support tool under physician supervision, rather than as an independent decision-maker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Urology
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02350-8
Primary Topic
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary evaluation of a large language model for pediatric uroflowmetry interpretation: a single-center comparative analysis with local expert consensus

Nilsun Kuas, Aylin Gençler
BMC Urology
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
article

Preliminary evaluation of a large language model for pediatric uroflowmetry interpretation: a single-center comparative analysis with local expert consensus

Nilsun Kuas, Aylin Gençler
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence system in interpreting pediatric uroflowmetry (UFM) results using both conceptual knowledge and real-world clinical data. This retrospectively designed study involved a two-stage evaluation. In the first stage, 15 conceptual questions related to UFM were presented to the model. In the second stage, anonymized UFM recordings from 225 children aged 5–18 years were evaluated in five sequential analysis steps. Responses were reviewed by a pediatric urologist and a pediatric nephrologist on a 0–2 point scale for accuracy, clinical reliability, and comprehensibility. All responses to conceptual questions were clinically accurate; however, only 64.4% of cited sources were considered reliable, with a substantial proportion identified as hallucinated citations. A total of 1125 responses from real clinical cases were analyzed. The cohort comprised a heterogeneous case mix including normal ( n = 96, 42.7%), abnormal ( n = 93, 41.3%), and suboptimal quality ( n = 36, 16.0%) recordings. Model responses demonstrated complete agreement with local, non-blinded expert consensus across all cases and all subgroups, with clinical accuracy, reliability, and comprehensibility rates of 100%. Visual reading differences due to handwritten PVR values were observed in six cases but did not affect the diagnostic approach or recommended management. The model’s mean self-reported confidence level was 88.4%. In this single-center, preliminary evaluation, the large language model’s responses showed complete raw agreement with local expert opinion in pediatric UFM interpretation; these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. The findings support the potential use of artificial intelligence as a clinical decision support tool under physician supervision, rather than as an independent decision-maker.

BMC Urology
Eskişehir City Hospital (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.