A subsidence-to-shear geomechanical framework for natural gas wellbore integrity in gas–coal co-exploitation areas

Natural gas wells in gas-coal co-exploitation areas commonly penetrate thick unconsolidated aeolian sand, underlying bedrock, and longwall-mining-disturbed coal-bearing strata. Mining-induced subsurface deformation can transfer along the wellbore, threatening integrity at mechanical discontinuities. This study integrates theoretical analysis, 3D numerical modeling, and field-measured subsidence data to investigate how incompatible deformation and shear slip near the sand-bedrock interface translate into localized transverse shear loading. Results show that differential sand-bedrock movement induces active–passive earth pressure asymmetry, concentrating an additional transverse shear force of up to 71.6 kN near the critical interface, accompanied by a positive-to-negative reversal of lateral bending moment with peak values of 26.4 and − 24.8 kN m. Under sustained lateral loading, the cement sheath reaches its shear limit before the steel casing, and local cracking may compromise zonal isolation and increase gas leakage risk. Based on an upper-bound shear-capacity model considering in-situ strength reduction, the ultimate cross-sectional shear capacity of the cement sheath was estimated at 107 kN. Numerical simulations calibrated a linear relationship between surface subsidence and transverse shear force, with a transmission coefficient of 1.087 kN/mm and an R-squared value of 0.982, yielding a critical surface subsidence threshold of 98.4 mm. Under conservative limit-state assumptions with an empirical safety margin, combined with field-measured dip-direction subsidence functions, the recommended risk-control offset from the subsidence-basin centerline was 404 m. This risk zoning framework supports wellbore integrity assessment, gas leakage risk control, and mining-boundary optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-026-01215-6
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A subsidence-to-shear geomechanical framework for natural gas wellbore integrity in gas–coal co-exploitation areas

Yuzhong Yang, Lei Li, Jiandong Ren, Junqi Lei et al.
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

A subsidence-to-shear geomechanical framework for natural gas wellbore integrity in gas–coal co-exploitation areas

Yuzhong Yang, Lei Li, Jiandong Ren, Junqi Lei, Yaowei Zhai, Shicheng Liu, Zhipeng Sun, Wanli Yang, Liyun Wu, Fengshi Yan, Lei Peng, Wen Wang
article en

Abstract

Natural gas wells in gas-coal co-exploitation areas commonly penetrate thick unconsolidated aeolian sand, underlying bedrock, and longwall-mining-disturbed coal-bearing strata. Mining-induced subsurface deformation can transfer along the wellbore, threatening integrity at mechanical discontinuities. This study integrates theoretical analysis, 3D numerical modeling, and field-measured subsidence data to investigate how incompatible deformation and shear slip near the sand-bedrock interface translate into localized transverse shear loading. Results show that differential sand-bedrock movement induces active–passive earth pressure asymmetry, concentrating an additional transverse shear force of up to 71.6 kN near the critical interface, accompanied by a positive-to-negative reversal of lateral bending moment with peak values of 26.4 and − 24.8 kN m. Under sustained lateral loading, the cement sheath reaches its shear limit before the steel casing, and local cracking may compromise zonal isolation and increase gas leakage risk. Based on an upper-bound shear-capacity model considering in-situ strength reduction, the ultimate cross-sectional shear capacity of the cement sheath was estimated at 107 kN. Numerical simulations calibrated a linear relationship between surface subsidence and transverse shear force, with a transmission coefficient of 1.087 kN/mm and an R-squared value of 0.982, yielding a critical surface subsidence threshold of 98.4 mm. Under conservative limit-state assumptions with an empirical safety margin, combined with field-measured dip-direction subsidence functions, the recommended risk-control offset from the subsidence-basin centerline was 404 m. This risk zoning framework supports wellbore integrity assessment, gas leakage risk control, and mining-boundary optimization.

Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Zhengzhou University (CN), Jiaozuo University (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, National Major Science and Technology Projects of China, Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.