Patient Centring in CT : An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions

INTRODUCTION: Accurate patient centring in computed tomography (CT) is essential for optimising radiation dose and ensuring consistent image quality. Mis-centring can affect automatic tube current modulation, compromise CT number accuracy and increase radiation exposure, but actual centring practices and knowledge differ widely. This study investigates CT centring practices, radiographers' knowledge of their implications and the use of advanced technologies for improved positioning accuracy. METHODS: An international survey was conducted among radiographers performing CT imaging using a 38-question questionnaire covering demographics, patient positioning, CT number variability, radiation dose management and auto-centring technologies. Translated into 12 languages, the survey was distributed through professional societies and social media, with data analysed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests. RESULTS: A total of 321 radiographers from 43 countries completed the survey. Vertical mis-centring was frequently identified by respondents as the predominant positioning error, with 101 (31.5%) reporting that patients were commonly positioned below the gantry isocentre. 126 of the respondents (39.3%) believed HU values likely change with mis-centring, while 76 (23.7%) were unsure. Understanding of localiser direction varied, with 113 (35.4%) stating it 'probably' affects radiation dose and 45 (14.1%) unsure. Although 110 (34.3%) had access to automated centring technologies, only 56 (17.4%) used them consistently. Practitioners holding CT-specific qualifications were more likely to achieve a high knowledge score than those without (58.3% vs. 55.7%; OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.70-1.76; p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: This global survey shows significant variability in CT patient-centring practices and knowledge. Improved training and more automated positioning tools are needed to optimise dose and image quality in CT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70119
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Centring in CT : An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions

Mark F. McEntee, Yasser H. Hadi, Niamh Moore, Salman Albeshan et al.
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Patient Centring in CT : An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions

Mark F. McEntee, Yasser H. Hadi, Niamh Moore, Salman Albeshan, Kevin Clark, Helle Precht, Yazan Al‐Hayek, Andrew England, Sultan B. Alghamdi, Mo’men Bani-Ahmad
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate patient centring in computed tomography (CT) is essential for optimising radiation dose and ensuring consistent image quality. Mis-centring can affect automatic tube current modulation, compromise CT number accuracy and increase radiation exposure, but actual centring practices and knowledge differ widely. This study investigates CT centring practices, radiographers' knowledge of their implications and the use of advanced technologies for improved positioning accuracy. METHODS: An international survey was conducted among radiographers performing CT imaging using a 38-question questionnaire covering demographics, patient positioning, CT number variability, radiation dose management and auto-centring technologies. Translated into 12 languages, the survey was distributed through professional societies and social media, with data analysed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests. RESULTS: A total of 321 radiographers from 43 countries completed the survey. Vertical mis-centring was frequently identified by respondents as the predominant positioning error, with 101 (31.5%) reporting that patients were commonly positioned below the gantry isocentre. 126 of the respondents (39.3%) believed HU values likely change with mis-centring, while 76 (23.7%) were unsure. Understanding of localiser direction varied, with 113 (35.4%) stating it 'probably' affects radiation dose and 45 (14.1%) unsure. Although 110 (34.3%) had access to automated centring technologies, only 56 (17.4%) used them consistently. Practitioners holding CT-specific qualifications were more likely to achieve a high knowledge score than those without (58.3% vs. 55.7%; OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.70-1.76; p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: This global survey shows significant variability in CT patient-centring practices and knowledge. Improved training and more automated positioning tools are needed to optimise dose and image quality in CT.

Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Charles Sturt University (AU), Hashemite University (JO), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University College Lillebaelt (DK), University College Cork (IE), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Saud University (SA), Security Forces Hospital (SA), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK), King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.