Carbon fetishism: towards a libidinal economy of net-zero capitalism

This article argues that political-economic analyses of climate change in terms of economically rational incentives, governance mechanisms, and the structural contradictions of capitalism overlook the constitutive irrationalities of economic behaviours. Drawing on the Global Libidinal Economy perspective, the paper outlines and develops the concept of ‘carbon fetishism’ to account for these dynamics. Our approach to fetishism is informed by Lacanian psychoanalysis, which complements the structural grammar of critical IPE with a subjective grammar that maps libidinal investments to economic investments. This develops the concept of fetishism beyond a Marxist account of commodity fetishism, emphasising commodification and production, to consider the libidinal aspects of fetishism and fantasy that animate debates over carbon, and its absence as ‘net-zero’. Combining these analyses, we argue that classically Marxist strategies of defetishisation are inadequate to addressing the lived realities of climate change, proposing a qualitative form of re-fetishisation instead: returning to anthropological and animist fetishisms of the natural world as a way to reimagine human/ecology relationships that might resist the dominant, quantitative fetishisms of CO2 equivalents that dominate political economic climate change imaginaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Economy
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2026.2727432
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon fetishism: towards a libidinal economy of net-zero capitalism

Chris Land, Steffen Böhm
New Political Economy
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Carbon fetishism: towards a libidinal economy of net-zero capitalism

Chris Land, Steffen Böhm
article en

Abstract

This article argues that political-economic analyses of climate change in terms of economically rational incentives, governance mechanisms, and the structural contradictions of capitalism overlook the constitutive irrationalities of economic behaviours. Drawing on the Global Libidinal Economy perspective, the paper outlines and develops the concept of ‘carbon fetishism’ to account for these dynamics. Our approach to fetishism is informed by Lacanian psychoanalysis, which complements the structural grammar of critical IPE with a subjective grammar that maps libidinal investments to economic investments. This develops the concept of fetishism beyond a Marxist account of commodity fetishism, emphasising commodification and production, to consider the libidinal aspects of fetishism and fantasy that animate debates over carbon, and its absence as ‘net-zero’. Combining these analyses, we argue that classically Marxist strategies of defetishisation are inadequate to addressing the lived realities of climate change, proposing a qualitative form of re-fetishisation instead: returning to anthropological and animist fetishisms of the natural world as a way to reimagine human/ecology relationships that might resist the dominant, quantitative fetishisms of CO2 equivalents that dominate political economic climate change imaginaries.

New Political Economy
University of Exeter (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.