Revisiting Ecological Footprint Dynamics in the BRICS ‐10 Economies: The Roles of Geopolitical Risk, Financial Development, and Economic Freedom

ABSTRACT This study examines the associations among geopolitical risk, financial development, economic freedom, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and ecological footprint in a BRICS‐10 sample comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates over the period 2000–2024. Guided by a STIRPAT‐informed framework, it uses ecological footprint as a broad indicator of environmental pressure to assess how geopolitical, financial, institutional, external, and structural factors are associated with ecological outcomes in a heterogeneous emerging‐economy setting. Empirically, the analysis applies the cross‐sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS‐ARDL) model to estimate short‐run and long‐run associations while accounting for cross‐sectional dependence and heterogeneity, and it employs augmented mean group (AMG) and common correlated effects mean group (CCEMG) estimators as robustness checks. The results show that geopolitical risk, foreign direct investment, and urbanization are positively associated with ecological footprint, whereas financial development and economic freedom are negatively associated with it. Overall, the findings suggest that ecological pressure in the BRICS‐10 economies is linked not only to external instability and urban expansion but also to the ways in which finance, institutions, and investment conditions shape production and resource use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71625
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Ecological Footprint Dynamics in the BRICS ‐10 Economies: The Roles of Geopolitical Risk, Financial Development, and Economic Freedom

Chun Kai Leung, Harry Fung Lee, Mohammad Ridwan, Youventharan Duraisamy et al.
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Revisiting Ecological Footprint Dynamics in the BRICS ‐10 Economies: The Roles of Geopolitical Risk, Financial Development, and Economic Freedom

Chun Kai Leung, Harry Fung Lee, Mohammad Ridwan, Youventharan Duraisamy, Arsene Mouongue Kelly, Afsana Akther, Jeremy Ko, K. P. Jaheer Mukthar, Imran Hossain
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the associations among geopolitical risk, financial development, economic freedom, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and ecological footprint in a BRICS‐10 sample comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates over the period 2000–2024. Guided by a STIRPAT‐informed framework, it uses ecological footprint as a broad indicator of environmental pressure to assess how geopolitical, financial, institutional, external, and structural factors are associated with ecological outcomes in a heterogeneous emerging‐economy setting. Empirically, the analysis applies the cross‐sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS‐ARDL) model to estimate short‐run and long‐run associations while accounting for cross‐sectional dependence and heterogeneity, and it employs augmented mean group (AMG) and common correlated effects mean group (CCEMG) estimators as robustness checks. The results show that geopolitical risk, foreign direct investment, and urbanization are positively associated with ecological footprint, whereas financial development and economic freedom are negatively associated with it. Overall, the findings suggest that ecological pressure in the BRICS‐10 economies is linked not only to external instability and urban expansion but also to the ways in which finance, institutions, and investment conditions shape production and resource use.

Sustainable Development
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY), Jain University (IN), Cyprus International University (CY), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Université de Dschang (CM), Noakhali Science and Technology University (BD), ETH Zurich (CH), Sustainability Institute (ZA), University of Hong Kong (HK), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.