Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Guidelines Across Six High‐Income Countries

BACKGROUND: Women in the United States (U.S.) experience higher maternal morbidity and mortality than other high-income countries, with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) among the most common, preventable contributors. Despite evidence supporting pharmacologic intervention, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines prioritize surveillance over active HDP management. This study compared ACOG guidance for HDP prevention, diagnosis, management, and postpartum follow-up with recommendations from six high-income countries. METHODS: Document analysis compared national HDP guidelines from Australia and New Zealand, Canada, Japan, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Kingdom with ACOG guidance, systematically coded across five domains: (1) first-trimester risk assessment, (2) preeclampsia prevention, (3) antihypertensive medication initiation thresholds, (4) postpartum monitoring, and (5) patient education. RESULTS: Divergences exist between ACOG and international guidelines across all domains. Most notably, ACOG recommends initiating antihypertensive medication at ≥ 160/110 mmHg for gestational hypertension, while international guidelines recommend initiation at ≥ 140/90 mmHg with specified targets. International guidelines also recommend calcium supplementation for low dietary intake, structured postpartum monitoring beyond 8 weeks, home-based monitoring, mental health screening, and education on long-term cardiovascular risk, elements underspecified in ACOG guidance. ACOG incorporates Black race and low income as independent aspirin prophylaxis risk criteria, though using race as a proxy for racism raises equity questions. No reviewed guideline explicitly defines midwifery roles in HDP management. DISCUSSION: Substantial divergences between ACOG and international guidelines suggest opportunities to strengthen U.S. HDP prevention and management. Recent trial evidence and persistent, inequitable maternal mortality support moving beyond voluntary recommendations toward accountability mechanisms driving consistent, evidence-based care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Birth
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70105
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Guidelines Across Six High‐Income Countries

Kandice A. Kapinos, Kortney Floyd James, Karen A. Scott, Lucinda Canty et al.
Birth
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Guidelines Across Six High‐Income Countries

Kandice A. Kapinos, Kortney Floyd James, Karen A. Scott, Lucinda Canty, Gabriela Alvarado, Alyssa A. Portes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women in the United States (U.S.) experience higher maternal morbidity and mortality than other high-income countries, with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) among the most common, preventable contributors. Despite evidence supporting pharmacologic intervention, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines prioritize surveillance over active HDP management. This study compared ACOG guidance for HDP prevention, diagnosis, management, and postpartum follow-up with recommendations from six high-income countries. METHODS: Document analysis compared national HDP guidelines from Australia and New Zealand, Canada, Japan, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Kingdom with ACOG guidance, systematically coded across five domains: (1) first-trimester risk assessment, (2) preeclampsia prevention, (3) antihypertensive medication initiation thresholds, (4) postpartum monitoring, and (5) patient education. RESULTS: Divergences exist between ACOG and international guidelines across all domains. Most notably, ACOG recommends initiating antihypertensive medication at ≥ 160/110 mmHg for gestational hypertension, while international guidelines recommend initiation at ≥ 140/90 mmHg with specified targets. International guidelines also recommend calcium supplementation for low dietary intake, structured postpartum monitoring beyond 8 weeks, home-based monitoring, mental health screening, and education on long-term cardiovascular risk, elements underspecified in ACOG guidance. ACOG incorporates Black race and low income as independent aspirin prophylaxis risk criteria, though using race as a proxy for racism raises equity questions. No reviewed guideline explicitly defines midwifery roles in HDP management. DISCUSSION: Substantial divergences between ACOG and international guidelines suggest opportunities to strengthen U.S. HDP prevention and management. Recent trial evidence and persistent, inequitable maternal mortality support moving beyond voluntary recommendations toward accountability mechanisms driving consistent, evidence-based care.

Birth
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), RAND Corporation (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Amherst College (US), Sarah Cannon (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.