Temporary Abdominal Closure After Damage Control Laparotomy for Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review of Primary Fascial Closure, Mortality and Enteroatmospheric Fistula

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) aims at three objectives: haemorrhage control, the control of enteric contamination, and reversal of the lethal triad. The abdomen is left open and the temporary abdominal closure (TAC) used in the first operation largely determines whether those objectives are achieved with an abdomen that is definitively closed. In this review we examined whether negative-pressure TAC, especially when coupled with continuous fascial traction, improves primary fascial closure (PFC), mortality and enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) after DCL for abdominal trauma compared with non-negative pressure. We searched using PRISMA 2020 and prospective PROSPERO registration CRD420261487225, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar from inception to 30 September 2026 for comparative studies of patients aged ≥16 years on the open abdomen after abdominal trauma. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I and certainty with GRADE. There was heterogeneity so no pooling of data and the synthesis was narrative. Of the 842 records used, 41 were sent for full-text review and 5 were included (1,512 patients). There was a randomised study, two prospective multicentre studies and two retrospective studies. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) achieved a PFC rate of 69% vs 51% in the vacuum-packing technique (p = 0.03), while 30-day survival was 14% versus 30% (p = 0.01) and the adjusted odds ratio was 3.17 (95% CI 1.22-8.26). A significant reduction in 90-day mortality was found in the randomised trial when active negative-pressure peritoneal therapy was involved (hazard ratio 0.32 and 95% CI 0.11-0.93). The persistence of mesh-mediated fascial traction was associated with improved survival (log-rank p = 0.019). Failure to attain PFC was predicted by the number of re-explorations (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and the EAF. No technique increased fistula formation. Certainty was low to moderate. NPWT, ideally with continuous fascial traction, should be the default TAC after DCL for abdominal trauma; non-negative pressure techniques can only be acceptable if resources are limited. Re-exploration and closing the fascia at the earliest safe time are the modifiable factors to achieve success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i9-06
Primary Topic
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Temporary Abdominal Closure After Damage Control Laparotomy for Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review of Primary Fascial Closure, Mortality and Enteroatmospheric Fistula

José David Rodríguez Enríquez, Enrique Córdova López, Paul Alejandro Palacios Zaragoza, Luz Maria Ortega Sandoval et al.
International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
article

Temporary Abdominal Closure After Damage Control Laparotomy for Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review of Primary Fascial Closure, Mortality and Enteroatmospheric Fistula

José David Rodríguez Enríquez, Enrique Córdova López, Paul Alejandro Palacios Zaragoza, Luz Maria Ortega Sandoval, Miguel Ángel Usiel Ramírez Ascencio, Eliam Humberto Ramos Jiménez, Alan Yael Cervantes Ramirez, Laura Itzel Ramos López, Maria Janeth Frias Duarte
article en

Abstract

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) aims at three objectives: haemorrhage control, the control of enteric contamination, and reversal of the lethal triad. The abdomen is left open and the temporary abdominal closure (TAC) used in the first operation largely determines whether those objectives are achieved with an abdomen that is definitively closed. In this review we examined whether negative-pressure TAC, especially when coupled with continuous fascial traction, improves primary fascial closure (PFC), mortality and enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) after DCL for abdominal trauma compared with non-negative pressure. We searched using PRISMA 2020 and prospective PROSPERO registration CRD420261487225, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar from inception to 30 September 2026 for comparative studies of patients aged ≥16 years on the open abdomen after abdominal trauma. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I and certainty with GRADE. There was heterogeneity so no pooling of data and the synthesis was narrative. Of the 842 records used, 41 were sent for full-text review and 5 were included (1,512 patients). There was a randomised study, two prospective multicentre studies and two retrospective studies. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) achieved a PFC rate of 69% vs 51% in the vacuum-packing technique (p = 0.03), while 30-day survival was 14% versus 30% (p = 0.01) and the adjusted odds ratio was 3.17 (95% CI 1.22-8.26). A significant reduction in 90-day mortality was found in the randomised trial when active negative-pressure peritoneal therapy was involved (hazard ratio 0.32 and 95% CI 0.11-0.93). The persistence of mesh-mediated fascial traction was associated with improved survival (log-rank p = 0.019). Failure to attain PFC was predicted by the number of re-explorations (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and the EAF. No technique increased fistula formation. Certainty was low to moderate. NPWT, ideally with continuous fascial traction, should be the default TAC after DCL for abdominal trauma; non-negative pressure techniques can only be acceptable if resources are limited. Re-exploration and closing the fascia at the earliest safe time are the modifiable factors to achieve success.

International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research StudiesVol. 06(09)
Autonomous University of Chihuahua (MX), Universidad Veracruzana (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Lamar Universidad (MX), Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas (MX), Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío (MX), Universidad Olmeca (MX), Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca (MX), Universidad de Colima (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.