The Masturbatory Ivory Tower: A Polemical Refutation of Semiotic Rhetoric and the Sanitisation of Material Oppression

This paper takes a direct swipe at the idea that we can solve real-world oppression through clever language games and high-minded theory. Focusing on the debates surrounding pornography and harmful speech, it challenges writers like Angela Carter, Frédéric Regard, and Judith Butler, who argue that subverting words and playing with symbols can set people free. It questions the bizarre claim that the Marquis de Sade's violent writings can be rebranded as "moral" or "ethical" feminist tools. Instead, the essay argues that treating physical violence, misogyny, and power as mere text ignores the painful reality of real human suffering. Language is not a fair playing field; those in power always use its flexibility in their favour to co-opt critique and protect themselves. We call out this academic approach as an out-of-touch, ivory-tower delusion that sanitises real harm, demanding a return to confronting actual material oppression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/z271k-cz933
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Masturbatory Ivory Tower: A Polemical Refutation of Semiotic Rhetoric and the Sanitisation of Material Oppression

Asia Kimberly Bandoles
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

The Masturbatory Ivory Tower: A Polemical Refutation of Semiotic Rhetoric and the Sanitisation of Material Oppression

Asia Kimberly Bandoles
article en

Abstract

This paper takes a direct swipe at the idea that we can solve real-world oppression through clever language games and high-minded theory. Focusing on the debates surrounding pornography and harmful speech, it challenges writers like Angela Carter, Frédéric Regard, and Judith Butler, who argue that subverting words and playing with symbols can set people free. It questions the bizarre claim that the Marquis de Sade's violent writings can be rebranded as "moral" or "ethical" feminist tools. Instead, the essay argues that treating physical violence, misogyny, and power as mere text ignores the painful reality of real human suffering. Language is not a fair playing field; those in power always use its flexibility in their favour to co-opt critique and protect themselves. We call out this academic approach as an out-of-touch, ivory-tower delusion that sanitises real harm, demanding a return to confronting actual material oppression.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
University of the Philippines Open University (PH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.