Evaluating Creativity in Generative AI Outputs: Dimensions and Cross-National Differences Among Art and Design Students

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has revolutionized the creative industries, prompting its widespread adoption in higher education. However, significant gaps remain regarding students’ perceptions of AI-generated visual outputs across different cultures. Employing a multi-stage methodological approach, this study first utilized focus groups to identify the dimensions underlying the perceived creativity of AI-generated visual outputs. Subsequently, a survey of 1,088 students from China and the U.S. was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), multi-group analysis (MGA), and artificial neural networks (ANN). Results indicate that novelty, resolution, and affect are significant evaluation dimensions in both national samples. However, distinct cross-national differences emerged: aesthetics and inspiration were significant for the U.S. students, whereas diversity and transferability were pivotal for Chinese students. These findings provide an empirically supported framework for educators and researchers to inform GenAI integration in art and design education and foster deeper human–AI creative collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Creativity Research Journal
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2026.2729228
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Creativity in Generative AI Outputs: Dimensions and Cross-National Differences Among Art and Design Students

Xiaomeng Yang, L Zhang, Yisiyang Yuan
Creativity Research Journal
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Evaluating Creativity in Generative AI Outputs: Dimensions and Cross-National Differences Among Art and Design Students

Xiaomeng Yang, L Zhang, Yisiyang Yuan
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has revolutionized the creative industries, prompting its widespread adoption in higher education. However, significant gaps remain regarding students’ perceptions of AI-generated visual outputs across different cultures. Employing a multi-stage methodological approach, this study first utilized focus groups to identify the dimensions underlying the perceived creativity of AI-generated visual outputs. Subsequently, a survey of 1,088 students from China and the U.S. was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), multi-group analysis (MGA), and artificial neural networks (ANN). Results indicate that novelty, resolution, and affect are significant evaluation dimensions in both national samples. However, distinct cross-national differences emerged: aesthetics and inspiration were significant for the U.S. students, whereas diversity and transferability were pivotal for Chinese students. These findings provide an empirically supported framework for educators and researchers to inform GenAI integration in art and design education and foster deeper human–AI creative collaboration.

Creativity Research Journal
Ningbo University (CN), Cornell University (US), Guizhou Institute of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.