From Coase to culture? Visible Hands Build Equilibria

Abstract This essay proposes that the classic distinction in Ronald Coase's 1937 paper ‘The nature of the firm’ ( Economica , vol. 4, pp. 386–405) between firms and markets be gracefully retired, having been duly celebrated for its field‐launching contribution to organizational economics. Some of the reasons for retiring this famous distinction rely on other insights from that seminal paper. In this sense, this essay offers an updated appreciation of Coase's paper. In addition, escaping this classic distinction motivates two agendas for organizational economics: (i) a redoubling of research on economic interactions that are organized but not within a single organization; and (ii) a ‘coalitional’ reconception of Coase's ‘conscious power’ of the entrepreneur that applies to the management of economic interactions not only within organizations but also between them. Both agendas seem likely to require new thinking about how parties build equilibria, so I close the essay by suggesting topics from the analysis of organizational culture that might inspire models of building equilibria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70071
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Coase to culture? Visible Hands Build Equilibria

Robert Gibbons
Economica
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

From Coase to culture? Visible Hands Build Equilibria

Robert Gibbons
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay proposes that the classic distinction in Ronald Coase's 1937 paper ‘The nature of the firm’ ( Economica , vol. 4, pp. 386–405) between firms and markets be gracefully retired, having been duly celebrated for its field‐launching contribution to organizational economics. Some of the reasons for retiring this famous distinction rely on other insights from that seminal paper. In this sense, this essay offers an updated appreciation of Coase's paper. In addition, escaping this classic distinction motivates two agendas for organizational economics: (i) a redoubling of research on economic interactions that are organized but not within a single organization; and (ii) a ‘coalitional’ reconception of Coase's ‘conscious power’ of the entrepreneur that applies to the management of economic interactions not only within organizations but also between them. Both agendas seem likely to require new thinking about how parties build equilibria, so I close the essay by suggesting topics from the analysis of organizational culture that might inspire models of building equilibria.

Economica
Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.