When Less Confidence Reaps More AI Benefits: A Compensatory Pattern Through Future Work Self-Salience

Introduction: In the context of AI becoming deeply embedded in professional environments, understanding how EAC drives employee innovative behavior (EIB) has become a critical issue in organizational psychology. Drawing on social cognitive theory (SCT) and complementarity theory, this study proposes an “Environment-Cognition-Behavior” framework to elucidate how employee–AI collaboration (EAC) drives EIB, specifically by assessing the mediating effect of future work self-salience (FWS) and the moderating effect of core self-evaluation (CSE). Methods: A three-wave time-lagged questionnaire survey was employed, and 457 valid employee responses were collected via the Credamo platform. The moderated mediation model was tested using regression-based path analysis and bootstrapping procedures. Results: EAC significantly and positively predicted EIB. FWS significantly mediated this relationship. CSE moderated the effect of EAC on FWS, yielding a significant moderated mediation effect. Notably, among employees with low CSE, the indirect pathway from EAC to EIB via FWS was stronger. Discussion: These findings extend SCT by identifying a pattern of person–environment interaction that is consistent with a compensatory interpretation in human–AI collaboration contexts. They also clarify the cognitive mechanism and individual-level boundary condition underlying AI-enabled innovation and provide practical implications for differentiated AI management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091585
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Less Confidence Reaps More AI Benefits: A Compensatory Pattern Through Future Work Self-Salience

Qi Li, Yanlong Zhang, Zhiyong Han, Xiaobo Dong
Behavioral Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When Less Confidence Reaps More AI Benefits: A Compensatory Pattern Through Future Work Self-Salience

Qi Li, Yanlong Zhang, Zhiyong Han, Xiaobo Dong
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of AI becoming deeply embedded in professional environments, understanding how EAC drives employee innovative behavior (EIB) has become a critical issue in organizational psychology. Drawing on social cognitive theory (SCT) and complementarity theory, this study proposes an “Environment-Cognition-Behavior” framework to elucidate how employee–AI collaboration (EAC) drives EIB, specifically by assessing the mediating effect of future work self-salience (FWS) and the moderating effect of core self-evaluation (CSE). Methods: A three-wave time-lagged questionnaire survey was employed, and 457 valid employee responses were collected via the Credamo platform. The moderated mediation model was tested using regression-based path analysis and bootstrapping procedures. Results: EAC significantly and positively predicted EIB. FWS significantly mediated this relationship. CSE moderated the effect of EAC on FWS, yielding a significant moderated mediation effect. Notably, among employees with low CSE, the indirect pathway from EAC to EIB via FWS was stronger. Discussion: These findings extend SCT by identifying a pattern of person–environment interaction that is consistent with a compensatory interpretation in human–AI collaboration contexts. They also clarify the cognitive mechanism and individual-level boundary condition underlying AI-enabled innovation and provide practical implications for differentiated AI management strategies.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(9)
Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.