A cU-Net-based surrogate model for predicting rough surface contact parameters in line-contact friction

Abstract Accurate and efficient prediction of contact parameters on rough surfaces is critical for the tribological design, condition monitoring, and failure analysis of line-contact components. Although physics-based models offer high prediction fidelity, their multi-field coupled iterative solvers are computationally expensive and complex, limiting practical engineering deployment. This work proposes a digital surrogate model based on the conditional U-Net (cU-Net) for predicting the spatial distributions of contact parameters, including contact temperature, pressure, and heat flux, on rough surfaces in line-contact friction. Real surface topographies are augmented via the Generative Patch Nearest-Neighbor (GPNN) model, and a wide-ranging training dataset is constructed through batch computation using a boundary lubrication physics-based model. The cU-Net incorporates an operating condition embedding mechanism to enable unified prediction across multiple operating conditions. Multi-scale spatial and channel attention modules are further integrated to enhance cross-scale feature extraction. A four-component progressive composite loss, assembled from established loss terms and tailored to the sparse extreme-value characteristics of rough surface contact parameters, is combined with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization and a three-stage progressive training strategy. On completely unseen rough surfaces the model achieves mean relative errors of 3.53%, 12.32%, and 13.66% for the temperature, pressure, and heat flux fields, respectively, with peak and top-5% errors that are lower still, and it is approximately 105 times faster than the physics-based model on the same workstation. Out-of-distribution tests quantify the degradation of accuracy under extrapolated operating conditions. Retraining with datasets generated from the corresponding physics-based models is expected to extend the framework to other lubrication regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Friction
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/frict.2026.9441313
Primary Topic
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A cU-Net-based surrogate model for predicting rough surface contact parameters in line-contact friction

Yichun Xia, Yonggang Meng, Hui Cao
Friction
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
article

A cU-Net-based surrogate model for predicting rough surface contact parameters in line-contact friction

Yichun Xia, Yonggang Meng, Hui Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate and efficient prediction of contact parameters on rough surfaces is critical for the tribological design, condition monitoring, and failure analysis of line-contact components. Although physics-based models offer high prediction fidelity, their multi-field coupled iterative solvers are computationally expensive and complex, limiting practical engineering deployment. This work proposes a digital surrogate model based on the conditional U-Net (cU-Net) for predicting the spatial distributions of contact parameters, including contact temperature, pressure, and heat flux, on rough surfaces in line-contact friction. Real surface topographies are augmented via the Generative Patch Nearest-Neighbor (GPNN) model, and a wide-ranging training dataset is constructed through batch computation using a boundary lubrication physics-based model. The cU-Net incorporates an operating condition embedding mechanism to enable unified prediction across multiple operating conditions. Multi-scale spatial and channel attention modules are further integrated to enhance cross-scale feature extraction. A four-component progressive composite loss, assembled from established loss terms and tailored to the sparse extreme-value characteristics of rough surface contact parameters, is combined with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization and a three-stage progressive training strategy. On completely unseen rough surfaces the model achieves mean relative errors of 3.53%, 12.32%, and 13.66% for the temperature, pressure, and heat flux fields, respectively, with peak and top-5% errors that are lower still, and it is approximately 105 times faster than the physics-based model on the same workstation. Out-of-distribution tests quantify the degradation of accuracy under extrapolated operating conditions. Retraining with datasets generated from the corresponding physics-based models is expected to extend the framework to other lubrication regimes.

Friction
Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.