Exploring the Pathways of Green Development Behavior in Building Materials Enterprises Within an Individual–Organizational–Institutional Framework

The green transformation of enterprises is facing major challenges. However, how individual, organizational, and institutional factors jointly shape enterprise green development behavior remains insufficiently understood. This study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework covering individual, organizational, and institutional levels. Using expert surveys and data from 129 listed building materials companies from 2014 to 2023, the fuzzy-DEMATEL and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) methods are used to identify key factors and explore multiple paths to achieve green development behavior (GDB). This study found that: (1) executives’ green cognition, technological innovation capability, government penalties, media attention, green consumer demand, and market competitiveness are key factors; (2) no single factor is a necessary condition; (3) four equivalent driving configurations are identified: public opinion and market adaptation, executive leadership and market dynamics, external pressure and innovation synergy, and policy constraints and market breakthroughs; and (4) technological innovation capability and market competitiveness exhibit potential functional substitutability across different configurations. This study identifies key factors shaping enterprise strategies, reducing uncertainty in green initiatives and improving sustainable development decisions. The findings reveal nonlinear and synergistic mechanisms of GDB, challenging traditional linear approaches and offering a new framework for complex decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14091113
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring the Pathways of Green Development Behavior in Building Materials Enterprises Within an Individual–Organizational–Institutional Framework

Xingwei Li, Qiong Shen, Yuhong Yao, Yi Zhang et al.
Systems
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Exploring the Pathways of Green Development Behavior in Building Materials Enterprises Within an Individual–Organizational–Institutional Framework

Xingwei Li, Qiong Shen, Yuhong Yao, Yi Zhang, Chuhan Liu
article en

Abstract

The green transformation of enterprises is facing major challenges. However, how individual, organizational, and institutional factors jointly shape enterprise green development behavior remains insufficiently understood. This study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework covering individual, organizational, and institutional levels. Using expert surveys and data from 129 listed building materials companies from 2014 to 2023, the fuzzy-DEMATEL and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) methods are used to identify key factors and explore multiple paths to achieve green development behavior (GDB). This study found that: (1) executives’ green cognition, technological innovation capability, government penalties, media attention, green consumer demand, and market competitiveness are key factors; (2) no single factor is a necessary condition; (3) four equivalent driving configurations are identified: public opinion and market adaptation, executive leadership and market dynamics, external pressure and innovation synergy, and policy constraints and market breakthroughs; and (4) technological innovation capability and market competitiveness exhibit potential functional substitutability across different configurations. This study identifies key factors shaping enterprise strategies, reducing uncertainty in green initiatives and improving sustainable development decisions. The findings reveal nonlinear and synergistic mechanisms of GDB, challenging traditional linear approaches and offering a new framework for complex decision-making.

SystemsVol. 14(9)
Yunnan University (CN), Sichuan Agricultural University (CN), People's Government of Yunnan Province (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.