ESG Gains Without Financial Returns? Assessing the Impact of Circular Economy Business Models

ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of circular economy business model adoption on ESG (environmental, social, and governance) and financial performance using panel data from 646 listed Chinese manufacturing firms (2016–2022). The results show that circular supply and resource recovery models significantly improve ESG performance, while product life extension models have no such effect. The study also reveals heterogeneity in the effects of CEBMs across the three ESG pillars. However, none of the CEBM types significantly impact financial performance. From a signaling theory perspective, this gap may stem from firms' limited ability to communicate the value of circular practices effectively, weakening stakeholder recognition and economic returns. ESG performance does not mediate the relationship between CEBMs and financial performance. This study offers actionable implications for managers and policymakers seeking to align business model innovation with sustainable development goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71518
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

ESG Gains Without Financial Returns? Assessing the Impact of Circular Economy Business Models

Yuxin Yi, Peter Teirlinck, Annick Van Rossem, Liming Zhang
Business Strategy and the Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

ESG Gains Without Financial Returns? Assessing the Impact of Circular Economy Business Models

Yuxin Yi, Peter Teirlinck, Annick Van Rossem, Liming Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of circular economy business model adoption on ESG (environmental, social, and governance) and financial performance using panel data from 646 listed Chinese manufacturing firms (2016–2022). The results show that circular supply and resource recovery models significantly improve ESG performance, while product life extension models have no such effect. The study also reveals heterogeneity in the effects of CEBMs across the three ESG pillars. However, none of the CEBM types significantly impact financial performance. From a signaling theory perspective, this gap may stem from firms' limited ability to communicate the value of circular practices effectively, weakening stakeholder recognition and economic returns. ESG performance does not mediate the relationship between CEBMs and financial performance. This study offers actionable implications for managers and policymakers seeking to align business model innovation with sustainable development goals.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Sichuan University (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ESG Gains Without Financial Returns? Assessing the Impact of Circular Economy Business Models — Yuxin Yi, Peter Teirlinck, et al. · Business Strategy and the Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS