Psychosocial and supportive care in radiation therapy: a qualitative comparison of Norway and Canada

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) are well positioned to address psychosocial and supportive care (PSSC) needs through daily patient contact. However, PSSC remains inconsistently integrated in practice. Building on prior cross-national survey findings, this study aimed to deepen understanding of how Norwegian and Canadian RTTs' perceptions and practices in providing PSSC, and identify barriers and opportunities to improve PSSC delivery. METHODS: A qualitative comparative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with RTTs practicing in Norway and Canada. Participants were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. The interview guide explored four categories: 1) demographics; 2) perceptions and current practices related to PSSC; 3) barriers and enablers of PSSC; and 4) opportunities to improve PSSC delivery. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to identify themes and compare patterns across both countries. RESULTS: A total of 26 RTTs were interviewed (Norway: n = 13; Canada: n = 13). RTTs in both countries recognized the importance of providing psychosocial support and care to patients undergoing radiation therapy. Norwegian RTTs described protecting relational care through scheduling flexibility and supportive environments. Canadian RTTs described delivering PSSC through structured assessments and integrating tasks within time- and staffing-constrained environment. Shared barriers included limited time and variable awareness of resources. CONCLUSION: Norwegian and Canadian RTTs described a strong commitment to PSSC, but organizational conditions shaped how care was delivered. Norwegian RTTs used a flexible patient-centered approach, while Canadian RTTs relied on a structured approach. Effective PSSC delivery requires alignment between RTTs' roles, targeted education, and institutional structures that support quality care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11181-0
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial and supportive care in radiation therapy: a qualitative comparison of Norway and Canada

Arlinda Ruco, Christine Tørris, Safora Johansen, Sophie Bezanson et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Psychosocial and supportive care in radiation therapy: a qualitative comparison of Norway and Canada

Arlinda Ruco, Christine Tørris, Safora Johansen, Sophie Bezanson, Espen Aas, Julia Penney
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) are well positioned to address psychosocial and supportive care (PSSC) needs through daily patient contact. However, PSSC remains inconsistently integrated in practice. Building on prior cross-national survey findings, this study aimed to deepen understanding of how Norwegian and Canadian RTTs' perceptions and practices in providing PSSC, and identify barriers and opportunities to improve PSSC delivery. METHODS: A qualitative comparative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with RTTs practicing in Norway and Canada. Participants were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. The interview guide explored four categories: 1) demographics; 2) perceptions and current practices related to PSSC; 3) barriers and enablers of PSSC; and 4) opportunities to improve PSSC delivery. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to identify themes and compare patterns across both countries. RESULTS: A total of 26 RTTs were interviewed (Norway: n = 13; Canada: n = 13). RTTs in both countries recognized the importance of providing psychosocial support and care to patients undergoing radiation therapy. Norwegian RTTs described protecting relational care through scheduling flexibility and supportive environments. Canadian RTTs described delivering PSSC through structured assessments and integrating tasks within time- and staffing-constrained environment. Shared barriers included limited time and variable awareness of resources. CONCLUSION: Norwegian and Canadian RTTs described a strong commitment to PSSC, but organizational conditions shaped how care was delivered. Norwegian RTTs used a flexible patient-centered approach, while Canadian RTTs relied on a structured approach. Effective PSSC delivery requires alignment between RTTs' roles, targeted education, and institutional structures that support quality care.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Dalhousie University (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), St. Francis Xavier University (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA), Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute (CA), Inland Hospital (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.