Surface Roughness, Biofilm Accumulation, and Acidogenic Potential of Esthetic Orthodontic Brackets Exposed to Cigarette Smoke

Purpose To evaluate the effect of cigarette smoke on esthetic brackets. Methods Four commercial brackets ( n = 112), Ceramic ® , Composite ® , PolySafira ® , and Zetta ® were exposed for 21 consecutive days to cigarette smoke. The control group consisted of each bracket material maintained in artificial saliva and not exposed to cigarette smoke. Linear surface roughness was measured before and after exposure using optical profilometry, and surface morphology was qualitatively characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the exposure period. Subsequently, the brackets were subjected to an acidogenic challenge in a multispecies biofilm with 2% sucrose. After 48 h, biofilm viability was assessed (CFU/mL), and the culture medium pH was analyzed. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, and a paired t -test ( p < .05). Results Zetta ® showed the greatest increase in Ra (+0.27 µm), and Ceramic ® exhibited a slight increase (+0.06 µm). Composite ® and PolySafira ® demonstrated a reduction in Ra values ( p < .05). Composite ® accumulated the highest amount of viable biofilm (6.44 × 10 4 CFU/mL), whereas Ceramic ® presented the lowest (3.56 × 10 4 CFU/mL). All groups showed a significant pH reduction after biofilm formation, with Composite ® demonstrating the most pronounced acidification (pH 6.5–5.2) and Ceramic ® the least (pH 6.8–5.9). Conclusions Cigarette smoke exposure adversely affected surface characteristics and acidogenic potential in esthetic orthodontic brackets. Ceramic ® showed lower biofilm accumulation and less pronounced surface roughness changes, while PolySafira ® showed stable surface behavior, and Zetta ® and Composite ® were more susceptible to surface alterations and biological challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497418261480777
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Surface Roughness, Biofilm Accumulation, and Acidogenic Potential of Esthetic Orthodontic Brackets Exposed to Cigarette Smoke

Carlos Nelson Elias, Sarah Pereira Martins, Kelly Galisteu Luiz, Kenderson Santos Silva et al.
Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
article

Surface Roughness, Biofilm Accumulation, and Acidogenic Potential of Esthetic Orthodontic Brackets Exposed to Cigarette Smoke

Carlos Nelson Elias, Sarah Pereira Martins, Kelly Galisteu Luiz, Kenderson Santos Silva, Luíza Trindade Vilela, Luísa Schubach da Costa Barreto, Flávio Mendonça Copello, Karla Karoline Leite do Rosário, Margareth Maria Gomes de Souza, Gabriela Drago VIDAL, Mylena da Rocha Cavalcante
article en

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effect of cigarette smoke on esthetic brackets. Methods Four commercial brackets ( n = 112), Ceramic ® , Composite ® , PolySafira ® , and Zetta ® were exposed for 21 consecutive days to cigarette smoke. The control group consisted of each bracket material maintained in artificial saliva and not exposed to cigarette smoke. Linear surface roughness was measured before and after exposure using optical profilometry, and surface morphology was qualitatively characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the exposure period. Subsequently, the brackets were subjected to an acidogenic challenge in a multispecies biofilm with 2% sucrose. After 48 h, biofilm viability was assessed (CFU/mL), and the culture medium pH was analyzed. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, and a paired t -test ( p < .05). Results Zetta ® showed the greatest increase in Ra (+0.27 µm), and Ceramic ® exhibited a slight increase (+0.06 µm). Composite ® and PolySafira ® demonstrated a reduction in Ra values ( p < .05). Composite ® accumulated the highest amount of viable biofilm (6.44 × 10 4 CFU/mL), whereas Ceramic ® presented the lowest (3.56 × 10 4 CFU/mL). All groups showed a significant pH reduction after biofilm formation, with Composite ® demonstrating the most pronounced acidification (pH 6.5–5.2) and Ceramic ® the least (pH 6.8–5.9). Conclusions Cigarette smoke exposure adversely affected surface characteristics and acidogenic potential in esthetic orthodontic brackets. Ceramic ® showed lower biofilm accumulation and less pronounced surface roughness changes, while PolySafira ® showed stable surface behavior, and Zetta ® and Composite ® were more susceptible to surface alterations and biological challenges.

Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Military Institute of Engineering (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.