Evolution of ecological indicators in the assessment of restoration of mining‐degraded riparian forests: a global bibliometric analysis (1990–2024)

Abstract Introduction The restoration of mining‐degraded riparian forests faces challenges due to structural, compositional, and functional impacts on these ecosystems. The demand for effective monitoring requires an understanding of how ecological indicators have been applied to assess post‐mining restoration success. Objectives To evaluate the restoration of riparian forests in mined areas based on scientific articles published in recent decades (1990–2024), seeking to identify temporal trends, geographic distribution, restoration methods, and patterns of integration among compositional, structural, and functional indicators. Methods A total of 101 articles selected from international databases were analyzed. Data were extracted to evaluate temporal and geographic distribution, journals, mineral types, restoration methods, and categories of ecological indicators. Results Publications increased markedly from 2020 onward, with China, the United States, Brazil, and Australia as leading contributors. Functional indicators predominated (87.3% in recent studies), with a progressive increase in the integration of composition, structure, and function. Seedling planting was the most frequent restoration method (48.3%). Indicator selection varied according to restoration method and mineral type, with integrated approaches more common in metallic mining, particularly gold. Conclusions The field has evolved from the use of isolated indicators to multidimensional assessments. Methodological variation persists across restoration methods and mineral types, highlighting the need for standardization to enable robust comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70542
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of ecological indicators in the assessment of restoration of mining‐degraded riparian forests: a global bibliometric analysis (1990–2024)

Walmer Bruno Rocha Martins, Julia Isabella de Matos Rodrigues, M. F. PEREIRA, B.R.F. SILVA et al.
Restoration Ecology
Mining and Resource Management
article

Evolution of ecological indicators in the assessment of restoration of mining‐degraded riparian forests: a global bibliometric analysis (1990–2024)

Walmer Bruno Rocha Martins, Julia Isabella de Matos Rodrigues, M. F. PEREIRA, B.R.F. SILVA, Vitoria L. dos Passos, Paula D. M. Moraes, Ricardo C. L. Machado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The restoration of mining‐degraded riparian forests faces challenges due to structural, compositional, and functional impacts on these ecosystems. The demand for effective monitoring requires an understanding of how ecological indicators have been applied to assess post‐mining restoration success. Objectives To evaluate the restoration of riparian forests in mined areas based on scientific articles published in recent decades (1990–2024), seeking to identify temporal trends, geographic distribution, restoration methods, and patterns of integration among compositional, structural, and functional indicators. Methods A total of 101 articles selected from international databases were analyzed. Data were extracted to evaluate temporal and geographic distribution, journals, mineral types, restoration methods, and categories of ecological indicators. Results Publications increased markedly from 2020 onward, with China, the United States, Brazil, and Australia as leading contributors. Functional indicators predominated (87.3% in recent studies), with a progressive increase in the integration of composition, structure, and function. Seedling planting was the most frequent restoration method (48.3%). Indicator selection varied according to restoration method and mineral type, with integrated approaches more common in metallic mining, particularly gold. Conclusions The field has evolved from the use of isolated indicators to multidimensional assessments. Methodological variation persists across restoration methods and mineral types, highlighting the need for standardization to enable robust comparisons.

Restoration Ecology
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (BR), Vale Technological Institute (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.