Online-compatible EMG onset detection: benchmarking common detectors under large signal variability

Introduction Muscle activation timing is commonly used inbiomechanics to analyse motor control strategies andinfer movement intent (e.g., to trigger assistivedevices). Indeed, because of the electromechanicaldelay (EMD), surface electromyogram (EMG) canprecede force and motion by tens of milliseconds.However, robust online onset detection remainsdifficult under real-life variability: a fixed parameterset must cover a wide working range, while causalprocessing adds delay and makes rejection oferroneous detections more challenging (Carvalho et al.2023). Moreover, most detectors are evaluated offline,and validation protocols vary widely, whichcomplicates comparisons across studies (Carvalho etal. 2023).[…]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Biomechanics Journal
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46298/mbj.19201
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online-compatible EMG onset detection: benchmarking common detectors under large signal variability

Gauthier Desmyttere, Gilles Dusfour, Christian Jørgensen, Louise Scherrer et al.
1 links
Multidisciplinary Biomechanics Journal
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Online-compatible EMG onset detection: benchmarking common detectors under large signal variability

Gauthier Desmyttere, Gilles Dusfour, Christian Jørgensen, Louise Scherrer, Abderrahmane Kheddar, Sofiane Ramdani
article en

Abstract

Introduction Muscle activation timing is commonly used inbiomechanics to analyse motor control strategies andinfer movement intent (e.g., to trigger assistivedevices). Indeed, because of the electromechanicaldelay (EMD), surface electromyogram (EMG) canprecede force and motion by tens of milliseconds.However, robust online onset detection remainsdifficult under real-life variability: a fixed parameterset must cover a wide working range, while causalprocessing adds delay and makes rejection oferroneous detections more challenging (Carvalho et al.2023). Moreover, most detectors are evaluated offline,and validation protocols vary widely, whichcomplicates comparisons across studies (Carvalho etal. 2023).[…]

Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalVol. 51st congress of the Société...(Methodological approaches for...)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Institute for Regenerative Medicine & Biotherapy (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (FR), IMT Mines Alès (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Online-compatible EMG onset detection: benchmarking common detectors under large signal variability — Gauthier Desmyttere, Gilles Dusfour, et al. · Multidisciplinary Biomechanics Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS