Patients 40 Years of Age or Older Have Comparable Return to Sport Rates, Reinjury Rates, and 2‐Year Patient‐Reported Outcomes After Medial or Lateral Meniscus Repair Compared With Patients Younger Than 40 Years of Age

Purpose To compare patient‐reported outcomes, return to sport (RTS), and reinjury rates after meniscus repair in patients over and under the age of 40 years old. Methods Meniscus repair cases performed at a single tertiary care center between December 2010 and August 2021 with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up data were reviewed. Patient‐reported outcome measures, RTS, and reinjury data were obtained from an institutional knee registry and prospective surveys. Patients were classified as (1) <40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (2) ≥40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (3) <40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and (4) ≥40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Results One hundred thirty patients were included, 91 were <40 years old and 39 were ≥40 years old (56% men). Of the tears, 66.2% (n = 86) were medial, 26.9% (n = 35) were lateral, and 6.9% (n = 9) were both medial and lateral. In patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in 2‐year International Knee Documentation Committee scores ( P = .58), RTS ( P = .80), or meniscus repair failure rates ( P > .99) between different age groups. In isolated meniscus repairs, there were no statistically significant differences in 2‐year International Knee Documentation Committee scores ( P = .72), RTS ( P = .24), or meniscus repair failure rates ( P = .54) between age groups. At 2‐year follow‐up, over 80% of patients in both age groups achieved the minimum clinically important difference across all patient‐reported outcomes, with no significant differences in minimum clinically important difference achievement between patients younger than 40 years and those aged 40 years or older. Conclusions In this study, we found that patients 40 years or older who undergo meniscus repair experience similar 2‐year patient‐reported outcome measures, RTS, and failure rates compared with patients younger than 40. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70071
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients 40 Years of Age or Older Have Comparable Return to Sport Rates, Reinjury Rates, and 2‐Year Patient‐Reported Outcomes After Medial or Lateral Meniscus Repair Compared With Patients Younger Than 40 Years of Age

Thun Itthipanichpong, Akshay Raghuram, Alexander E. White, Tyler J. Uppstrom et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Patients 40 Years of Age or Older Have Comparable Return to Sport Rates, Reinjury Rates, and 2‐Year Patient‐Reported Outcomes After Medial or Lateral Meniscus Repair Compared With Patients Younger Than 40 Years of Age

Thun Itthipanichpong, Akshay Raghuram, Alexander E. White, Tyler J. Uppstrom, Anil S. Ranawat, Robert B. Baldwin, Shu-Han Wang, Samarth V. Menta
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare patient‐reported outcomes, return to sport (RTS), and reinjury rates after meniscus repair in patients over and under the age of 40 years old. Methods Meniscus repair cases performed at a single tertiary care center between December 2010 and August 2021 with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up data were reviewed. Patient‐reported outcome measures, RTS, and reinjury data were obtained from an institutional knee registry and prospective surveys. Patients were classified as (1) <40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (2) ≥40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (3) <40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and (4) ≥40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Results One hundred thirty patients were included, 91 were <40 years old and 39 were ≥40 years old (56% men). Of the tears, 66.2% (n = 86) were medial, 26.9% (n = 35) were lateral, and 6.9% (n = 9) were both medial and lateral. In patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in 2‐year International Knee Documentation Committee scores ( P = .58), RTS ( P = .80), or meniscus repair failure rates ( P > .99) between different age groups. In isolated meniscus repairs, there were no statistically significant differences in 2‐year International Knee Documentation Committee scores ( P = .72), RTS ( P = .24), or meniscus repair failure rates ( P = .54) between age groups. At 2‐year follow‐up, over 80% of patients in both age groups achieved the minimum clinically important difference across all patient‐reported outcomes, with no significant differences in minimum clinically important difference achievement between patients younger than 40 years and those aged 40 years or older. Conclusions In this study, we found that patients 40 years or older who undergo meniscus repair experience similar 2‐year patient‐reported outcome measures, RTS, and failure rates compared with patients younger than 40. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.