AI vs. human touch: Comparing non-AI and AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (IDLE) and their associations with affective variables and L2 willingness to communicate

The advancement of digital technologies has spurred a surge in research on informal digital learning of English (IDLE) in second language (L2) acquisition. However, few studies have compared the relationships between artificial intelligence (AI) and non-AI-IDLE on affective variables such as grit, motivation, self-confidence, and L2 speaking anxiety, which are associated with L2 willingness to communicate (WTC). To address this gap, this study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context of Iran, collecting data through 250 questionnaires and 10 semi-structured interviews. Multiple regression modeling revealed that while both digital environments correlated with the affective variables, only non-AI IDLE, self-confidence, grit, and motivation acted as significant predictors of L2 WTC. Complementing these statistical insights, thematic analysis of the qualitative findings provided critical context for this human-centric preference, suggesting that non-AI-IDLE fostered greater community engagement and situational awareness compared to AI-IDLE. These results highlight the importance of balancing AI and non-AI IDLE to support students' affective variables and enhance their L2 WTC. This research not only contributes to a deeper understanding of IDLE and L2 communication behaviors but also emphasizes the need for further investigation into the evolving role of AI in informal language learning in the rapidly changing world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107759
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI vs. human touch: Comparing non-AI and AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (IDLE) and their associations with affective variables and L2 willingness to communicate

Barry Lee Reynolds, Ali Soyoof, Guangxiang Liu
Acta Psychologica
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI vs. human touch: Comparing non-AI and AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (IDLE) and their associations with affective variables and L2 willingness to communicate

Barry Lee Reynolds, Ali Soyoof, Guangxiang Liu
article en

Abstract

The advancement of digital technologies has spurred a surge in research on informal digital learning of English (IDLE) in second language (L2) acquisition. However, few studies have compared the relationships between artificial intelligence (AI) and non-AI-IDLE on affective variables such as grit, motivation, self-confidence, and L2 speaking anxiety, which are associated with L2 willingness to communicate (WTC). To address this gap, this study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context of Iran, collecting data through 250 questionnaires and 10 semi-structured interviews. Multiple regression modeling revealed that while both digital environments correlated with the affective variables, only non-AI IDLE, self-confidence, grit, and motivation acted as significant predictors of L2 WTC. Complementing these statistical insights, thematic analysis of the qualitative findings provided critical context for this human-centric preference, suggesting that non-AI-IDLE fostered greater community engagement and situational awareness compared to AI-IDLE. These results highlight the importance of balancing AI and non-AI IDLE to support students' affective variables and enhance their L2 WTC. This research not only contributes to a deeper understanding of IDLE and L2 communication behaviors but also emphasizes the need for further investigation into the evolving role of AI in informal language learning in the rapidly changing world.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 270
University of Macau (MO), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Southeast University (BD), Southeast University (CN)
Universidade de Macau
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.