An International Delphi Consensus on Meniscus Radial Tears: From Diagnosis to Management and Rehabilitation

PURPOSE: To establish consensus statements on risk factors, diagnosis, nonoperative management, surgical indications and techniques, rehabilitation strategies, and clinical and functional outcomes of meniscus radial tears (MRT). METHODS: A working group of fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons developed original statements based on a review of the current literature on MRT. A panel of 45 international orthopaedic surgeons was surveyed. Agreement with each statement was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, and statements were retained, revised, or excluded according to predefined thresholds (≥80% agreement and <20% disagreement). Expert-suggested revisions and additional statements generated during the first 2 rounds were further reviewed and voted on in the final round 3. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on repair for isolated acute traumatic MRTs and those associated with acute cruciate ligament injuries, whereas repair in chronic degenerative tears should be based on meniscal tissue quality and degree of osteoarthritis. Although partial meniscectomy may provide short-term relief, its long-term detrimental effects should not be underestimated. Increased age alone was not considered a risk factor for MRT repair. Successful healing requires addressing peripheral extension and gapping, with anatomic restoration prioritized over surgical technique or suture choice. Given limited evidence on early weightbearing and unrestricted motion, a conservative postoperative protocol is advised. No repair technique has proven superior with choice guided by surgeon preference. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus supports repair of acute traumatic and acute cruciate ligament-associated MRTs, whereas indications for chronic degenerative tears depend on tissue quality and joint status. Increased age alone was not considered a contraindication to MRT repair. Anatomic restoration is essential for a successful outcome, irrespective of surgical technique. An initial nonweight-bearing rehabilitation protocol is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion, modified Delphi consensus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70456
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An International Delphi Consensus on Meniscus Radial Tears: From Diagnosis to Management and Rehabilitation

Lika Dzidzishvili, Aaron John Krych, Jorge A. Chahla, J. Lee Pace et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

An International Delphi Consensus on Meniscus Radial Tears: From Diagnosis to Management and Rehabilitation

Lika Dzidzishvili, Aaron John Krych, Jorge A. Chahla, J. Lee Pace, Robert F. LaPrade, The Meniscus Radial Tear Expert Group, David C. Flanigan
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish consensus statements on risk factors, diagnosis, nonoperative management, surgical indications and techniques, rehabilitation strategies, and clinical and functional outcomes of meniscus radial tears (MRT). METHODS: A working group of fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons developed original statements based on a review of the current literature on MRT. A panel of 45 international orthopaedic surgeons was surveyed. Agreement with each statement was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, and statements were retained, revised, or excluded according to predefined thresholds (≥80% agreement and <20% disagreement). Expert-suggested revisions and additional statements generated during the first 2 rounds were further reviewed and voted on in the final round 3. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on repair for isolated acute traumatic MRTs and those associated with acute cruciate ligament injuries, whereas repair in chronic degenerative tears should be based on meniscal tissue quality and degree of osteoarthritis. Although partial meniscectomy may provide short-term relief, its long-term detrimental effects should not be underestimated. Increased age alone was not considered a risk factor for MRT repair. Successful healing requires addressing peripheral extension and gapping, with anatomic restoration prioritized over surgical technique or suture choice. Given limited evidence on early weightbearing and unrestricted motion, a conservative postoperative protocol is advised. No repair technique has proven superior with choice guided by surgeon preference. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus supports repair of acute traumatic and acute cruciate ligament-associated MRTs, whereas indications for chronic degenerative tears depend on tissue quality and joint status. Increased age alone was not considered a contraindication to MRT repair. Anatomic restoration is essential for a successful outcome, irrespective of surgical technique. An initial nonweight-bearing rehabilitation protocol is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion, modified Delphi consensus.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Rush University Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.